Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Hi Stefan^2, Hi Stefan, First of all, thank you for the detailed feedback! It is very helpful. I spent the last two weeks refactoring and reworking the tool. The main changes: * explicit --verbose mode, much quieter without it * progress output * only one common 'normalize' sub-command; acti

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: > Hi, > > as promised, answering the remaining questions now: > Hi Stefan, First of all, thank you for the detailed feedback! It is very helpful. I spent the last two weeks refactoring and reworking the tool. The main changes: * explicit --v

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Hi, as promised, answering the remaining questions now: [...] If you have any time requirements/considerations on your side which would require/benefit from earlier feedback, pls let me know. Right now, we are all working towards the 1.9 RC. Feedback in May or June would be nice. The

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Hi Stefan, If you have a working build environment for Subversion, you might have a look at this branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/svn-mergeinfo-normalizer It provides a new tool that you might find useful: ./tools/client-sid

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Stefan Hett wrote: > Hi Stefan^2, > > Hi Stefan, >> >> If you have a working build environment for Subversion, >> you might have a look at this branch: >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/svn-mergeinfo-normalizer >> >> It provides a new

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Hi Stefan^2, Hi Stefan, If you have a working build environment for Subversion, you might have a look at this branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/svn-mergeinfo-normalizer It provides a new tool that you might find useful: ./tools/client-side/svn-mergeinfo-normalizer/

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Hi, Building SVN now succeeds (120 warnings which I ignore for the time being though), but when trying to start the built svn.exe process, I'm facing the following error popup. --- svn.exe - Entry Point Not Found --- The procedure entry point svn__

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: >> >> Hi Stefan^2, >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: >>> >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> thanks for taking the time to write that tool. >>> I've scheduled a time-slot to c

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: > Hi Stefan^2, > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: > >> Hi Stefan, >> >> thanks for taking the time to write that tool. >> I've scheduled a time-slot to check this out/test on our side. >> Unfortunately, our current proje

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Hi Stefan^2, On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Stefan Hett > wrote: Hi Stefan, thanks for taking the time to write that tool. I've scheduled a time-slot to check this out/test on our side. Unfortunately, our current project plan doesn't provide enough

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > thanks for taking the time to write that tool. > I've scheduled a time-slot to check this out/test on our side. > Unfortunately, our current project plan doesn't provide enough free time to > check this out in the next 2-4 week

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

t;mailto:ste...@egosoft.com>] *Sent:* dinsdag 24 februari 2015 11:28 *To:* Bert Huijben; 'subversion' *Subject:* Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records Hi Bert, thanks. That mostly does explain the current behavior to me. From a user's point of view I

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

r results were. -- Stefan^2. > *From:* Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com] > *Sent:* dinsdag 24 februari 2015 11:28 > *To:* Bert Huijben; 'subversion' > *Subject:* Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records > > > > Hi Bert, > > thanks. That mostly

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Hi Julian, thanks for the explanation. I'll make a note on our recorded issue here and will see to update our scripts/workflow to cope for this updated information on how --record-only behaves. Regards, Stefan Bert forwarded to dev@ from Stefan Hett: Bert wrote: I haven’t looked at the ful

Re: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

Bert forwarded to dev@ from Stefan Hett: > Bert wrote: >> I haven’t looked at the full details, but actual merges only store mergeinfo >> of what is actually merged (includes unaffected tree filtering, filtering >> what is already merged, etc.). A record only merge is a tool to just >> register as

RE: inconsistency between mergeinfo records

I see a few questions, that our merge experts over here on the dev@ list might have a better answer for than I have. Bert From: Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com] Sent: dinsdag 24 februari 2015 11:28 To: Bert Huijben; 'subversion' Subject: Re: inconsisten