solved: using bindfs to hide symbolic links from subversion (make subversion follow symlinks)

2013-11-08 Thread Dirk
Hello, I have changed bindfs to hide symbolic links from subversion so it commits the actual file to the repository. Here is the patch. (Mirror: http://pastebin.com/PfzpBMp6 ) Download: http://bindfs.org/downloads/bindfs-1.12.3.tar.gz tar xvfz bindfs-1.12.3.tar.gz mv bindfs-1.12.3 bindfs patc

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-07 Thread Ben Reser
op you from hi-jacking this thread with a self-loving > and off-topic rant about you using the commandline). > > Answer: > Look at the subject of this thread. It says "follow symlinks", also, I wrote > multiple times that i want to follow symbolic links. With subversion. I want

Re: follow symlinks (2)

2013-11-07 Thread C. Michael Pilato
com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.externals.html for documentation on that feature (if you're not already aware of it). > So subversion has been developed for more than a decade now and nobody > thought about adding --enable-follow-symlinks or something similar to > the configure script. F

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Dirk wrote: > On 11/07/13 01:47, Ben Reser wrote: >> First of all this really belongs on the users@ list and not dev@. But it's >> here now so let's look at what your issues are... > > It would belong to users@ is there was alre

follow symlinks (2)

2013-11-07 Thread Dirk
It is utterly pointless to argue here. You guys are hell-bent for having special files in repositories so you can abuse subversion for things that rsync or other backup solutions were made for and which are clearly not in the focus of a version control software anymore. On the other side: To f

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-07 Thread Dirk
On 11/07/13 01:47, Ben Reser wrote: > First of all this really belongs on the users@ list and not dev@. But it's > here now so let's look at what your issues are... It would belong to users@ is there was already an --enable-follow-symlinks option. But there isn't one.

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-07 Thread Dirk
On 11/07/13 01:45, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Dirk] It doesn't make a lot of sense. These special files are platform depending and there is no point in having them in /any/ repository. Even if it is a project that is only for a single platform it doesn't make sense storing special files in the rep

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.11.2013 01:47, Ben Reser wrote: > I think you're going to need to be a lot more specific about what > you're doing if you disagree. And perhaps just a teensy bit less certain that only your opinion can be correct. It's rather hard to have a technical discussion based on a bunch of vague and

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Ben Reser
t beast) and may or may not be better for your use case. svn:externals certainly have their own issues. But it's really difficult to make suggestions to based on what you've provided. If you hung around on IRC longer, so that people could engage more with you or if you spent more time exp

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Dirk] > It doesn't make a lot of sense. These special files are platform > depending and there is no point in having them in /any/ repository. > Even if it is a project that is only for a single platform it doesn't > make sense storing special files in the repository. Symlinks, device > files, et

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Dirk
On 11/06/13 22:58, Mark Phippard wrote: On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Dirk wrote: after going "full retard" in IRC (it was good for me) I have calmed down enough to give constructive criticism in regards of subversion and how it handles symbolic links on Unix (and compat.) platforms. I wan'

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Dirk
n the configure script to make subversion follow symlinks instead of storing these special files. I don't want so rain into the svn:externals parade. But symlinks are just more intuitive for people familar to Unix and it shows: https://www.google.com/search?q=subversion+follow+symlinks Thanks, Dirk

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:58:48PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: > Here is the original thread when the feature was added, I would assume this > was discussed but I suppose it might have happened prior to the patch being > submitted (did not read the entire thread): > > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archiv

reparing svn revision files (was: Re: follow symlinks)

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:49:31PM +0100, Dirk wrote: > Another Problem I have with subversion is that everything is stored in > binary files. It is not like that I damage my repositories all the time. It > happens maybe once every couple of years. But when it happens there is > nothing else to do

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Dirk wrote: > after going "full retard" in IRC (it was good for me) I have calmed down > enough to give constructive criticism in regards of subversion and how it > handles symbolic links on Unix (and compat.) platforms. > > I wan't to start with a question. I am c

follow symlinks

2013-11-06 Thread Dirk
on has been developed for more than a decade now and nobody thought about adding --enable-follow-symlinks or something similar to the configure script. Fine. I can do it myself. So I did just remove the #define HAVE_SYMLINKS from the config and build it myself. Only to end up with a client w