On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 16 June 2014 15:53, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Stefan2 pointed out that format 7 is less efficient if packing is
> disabled.
> > So to fully benefit from format 7 in the default configuration, users
> must
> > currently run 'svnadmin pack'
On 16 June 2014 15:53, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Stefan2 pointed out that format 7 is less efficient if packing is disabled.
> So to fully benefit from format 7 in the default configuration, users must
> currently run 'svnadmin pack' or edit fsfs.conf to enable packing after
> commit.
> Since form
gt; >>
> >> It looks like it makes sense to enable packing after commit by default
> >> for format 7 repositories. Any objections?
> >
> > And here's a more complete patch, fixing test fallout.
> >
> > [[[
> > Enable packing by default in for
rmat 7 repositories. Any objections?
>
> And here's a more complete patch, fixing test fallout.
>
> [[[
> Enable packing by default in format 7 FSFS repositories.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs.h
> (CONFIG_SECTION_DEBUG): Remove.
> (CONFIG_SECTION_PACKED_REVS): New
te patch, fixing test fallout.
[[[
Enable packing by default in format 7 FSFS repositories.
* subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs.h
(CONFIG_SECTION_DEBUG): Remove.
(CONFIG_SECTION_PACKED_REVS): New configuration section "packed-revisions",
which contains options controlling revision packing b
ld be safe to trigger
packing at any time.
It looks like it makes sense to enable packing after commit by default
for format 7 repositories. Any objections?
[[[
Enable packing by default in format 7 FSFS repositories.
* subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
(read_config): If the file format support
6 matches
Mail list logo
