Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-08 Thread Julian Foad
> On 05.01.2016, Julian Foad wrote: >> Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on >> this issue? Stefan wrote: > I'll have to retest the current trunk against the test case to check out the > current state. Quite busy atm though, so donno if I can squeeze it in this > w

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-06 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 05.01.2016 15:56, Julian Foad wrote: Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on this issue? I guess what you are asking is: Can this tool be used on production data? My answer is: Yes, but it is and will always be an expert tool. The 'analyse' command is perfectl

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-06 Thread Julian Foad
Stefan wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: >> Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on >> this issue? > > I'll have to retest the current trunk against the test case to check out the > current state. Quite busy atm though, so donno if I can squeeze it in this > week. Will do t

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-05 Thread Stefan
On 1/5/2016 15:56, Julian Foad wrote: Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on this issue? I'll have to retest the current trunk against the test case to check out the current state. Quite busy atm though, so donno if I can squeeze it in this week. Will do though, u

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-05 Thread Julian Foad
Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on this issue? - Julian On 25 August 2015, Stefan Hett wrote: > On 17 August 2015, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015, Stefan Hett wrote: >>> I came across a case where svn-normalizer did remove mergeinfo for a >>> br

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2015-08-25 Thread Stefan Hett
Hi, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Stefan Hett > wrote: Hi, I came across a case where svn-normalizer did remove mergeinfo for a branch which was still present but got renamed in one revision. I understand why it behaves the current way, but maybe i

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2015-08-16 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: > Hi, > > I came across a case where svn-normalizer did remove mergeinfo for a > branch which was still present but got renamed in one revision. > I understand why it behaves the current way, but maybe in favor of the > improvements done for ha

detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2015-07-22 Thread Stefan Hett
Hi, I came across a case where svn-normalizer did remove mergeinfo for a branch which was still present but got renamed in one revision. I understand why it behaves the current way, but maybe in favor of the improvements done for handling moves it might also be a good idea to have svn-normaliz