RE: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

2010-02-24 Thread Julian Foad
Bert, thanks for the further explanation. It's making a bit more sense. I'm going to trace the changes through the code and examine the DB before I try to comment any further. I certainly don't want to depend on a new editor - I just want to understand exactly how it works with the present editor

RE: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

2010-02-24 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: woensdag 24 februari 2010 15:24 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: WC-NG presence 'incomplete' > > On Mon, 2010-02-22, I (Julian Foad) wrote: > > Docum

Re: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

2010-02-24 Thread Julian Foad
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:24 +, Julian Foad wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-22, I (Julian Foad) wrote: > > Documenting WORKING.presence = 'incomplete'... > > [...] > > My take on this is that we should keep the meanings of the columns > > orthogonal as much as possible. At the DB schema level, there's

Re: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

2010-02-24 Thread Julian Foad
On Mon, 2010-02-22, I (Julian Foad) wrote: > Documenting WORKING.presence = 'incomplete'... [...] > My take on this is that we should keep the meanings of the columns > orthogonal as much as possible. At the DB schema level, there's no > reason why files, dirs and sym-links should not all have pro

WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

2010-02-22 Thread Julian Foad
Documenting WORKING.presence = 'incomplete'... I understand 'incomplete' means the same as 'normal' except that the node's children are not (known to be) all present and complete. Bert responded, "Yes on the incomplete part. (But it also applies to the properties on the directory). At least for e