Re: Vetos in 1.6.x branch -- and how they impact trunk

2011-05-18 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Paul Burba wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > >> There are some vetos in the 1.6.x branch that seem like they are >> questioning the change, not just whether it was a candidate for >> backport.  What does that mean for trunk and 1.7?

Re: Vetos in 1.6.x branch -- and how they impact trunk

2011-05-18 Thread Paul Burba
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > There are some vetos in the 1.6.x branch that seem like they are > questioning the change, not just whether it was a candidate for > backport.  What does that mean for trunk and 1.7?  Here are the items > I am thinking of (leaving out the it

Re: Vetos in 1.6.x branch -- and how they impact trunk

2011-05-17 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:48:07AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: > There are some vetos in the 1.6.x branch that seem like they are > questioning the change, not just whether it was a candidate for > backport. What does that mean for trunk and 1.7? Here are the items > I am thinking of (leaving out

Vetos in 1.6.x branch -- and how they impact trunk

2011-05-17 Thread Mark Phippard
There are some vetos in the 1.6.x branch that seem like they are questioning the change, not just whether it was a candidate for backport. What does that mean for trunk and 1.7? Here are the items I am thinking of (leaving out the items that were vetoed only because they were not considered appro