On 28. 2. 25 15:23, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
Den fre 28 feb. 2025 kl 15:16 skrev Stefan Sperling :
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 02:14:34PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> This is probably the minimal patch to disable this tweak.
Thanks, your diff looks good to me.
> There's a bunch of
Den fre 28 feb. 2025 kl 15:16 skrev Stefan Sperling :
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 02:14:34PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > This is probably the minimal patch to disable this tweak.
>
> Thanks, your diff looks good to me.
>
> > There's a bunch of
> > code that needs to be replaced or removed, though
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 02:14:34PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> This is probably the minimal patch to disable this tweak.
Thanks, your diff looks good to me.
> There's a bunch of
> code that needs to be replaced or removed, though.
These bits of code are easy to spot and remove.
Here is a diff f
On 28. 2. 25 13:45, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 26. 2. 25 15:20, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
Should have researched a bit more before replying. There was already some
code to do exactly this, but it was removed in r1722879:
[[[
stefan2 20
On 26. 2. 25 15:20, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
Should have researched a bit more before replying. There was already some
code to do exactly this, but it was removed in r1722879:
[[[
stefan2 2016-01-04 15:17:04
Stop using pointer arit
Daniel Sahlberg writes:
> Den ons 26 feb. 2025 kl 14:45 skrev Daniel Sahlberg
> :
>
> Den ons 26 feb. 2025 kl 14:30 skrev Stefan Sperling :
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:24:22PM +0100, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> > Looking at the code, I'm assuming that if SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK was
> > se
Daniel Sahlberg writes:
> Den ons 26 feb. 2025 kl 12:33 skrev Sam James :
>
> Hi!
>
> Hi,
Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the detailed report!
And thank you for the quick response (and Stefan too).
>
> When subversion-1.14.5 is built with upcoming GCC 15 with -O3 -mavx (or
> -O2 -mavx -fno-vect-
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> Should have researched a bit more before replying. There was already some
> code to do exactly this, but it was removed in r1722879:
>
> [[[
> stefan2 2016-01-04 15:17:04
> Stop using pointer arithmetics to check for proper alignm
Den ons 26 feb. 2025 kl 14:45 skrev Daniel Sahlberg <
daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>:
> Den ons 26 feb. 2025 kl 14:30 skrev Stefan Sperling :
>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:24:22PM +0100, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
>> > Looking at the code, I'm assuming that if SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK was
>> > set t
Den ons 26 feb. 2025 kl 14:30 skrev Stefan Sperling :
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:24:22PM +0100, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> > Looking at the code, I'm assuming that if SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK was
> > set to 0 (so the char by char loop after #endif is used instead), the
> code
> > would run just
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:24:22PM +0100, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> Looking at the code, I'm assuming that if SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK was
> set to 0 (so the char by char loop after #endif is used instead), the code
> would run just fine. Can you confirm that?
>
> SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK is de
Den ons 26 feb. 2025 kl 12:33 skrev Sam James :
> Hi!
>
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed report!
> When subversion-1.14.5 is built with upcoming GCC 15 with -O3 -mavx (or
> -O2 -mavx -fno-vect-cost-model), it crashes in some cases in
> svn_eol__find_eol_start.
>
> We found `svn checkout https://svn
Hi!
When subversion-1.14.5 is built with upcoming GCC 15 with -O3 -mavx (or
-O2 -mavx -fno-vect-cost-model), it crashes in some cases in
svn_eol__find_eol_start.
We found `svn checkout https://svn.code.sf.net/p/sdcc/code/trunk/sdcc`
was a reliable reproducer, as was `svn cleanup sdcc` once the fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
