On 09/20/2010 10:38 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> To recap, the change I'm proposing is that we check pathnames with NFC/D
> aware comparison routines upon add_file() / add_directory() inside
> libsvn_repos or libsvn_fs_* - of which I suspect it's easier to handle
> inside the latter. In my proposal,
Sorry to have left the discussion running so long without contributing to it
myself. The reason I started about changing the repository / fs is because
it is where we store the dataset that we'll need to support forever: working
copies get destroyed and checked out over and over every hour, every d
On 17.09.2010 13:22, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 00:59:59 -0400:
>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf
>>> wrote:
>> ...
If yes, then we infer that no two in-repository paths (which are
Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 15:55:57 -0400:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 04:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:22:12 -0400:
> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:26, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 00:59:59 -0400
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 04:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:22:12 -0400:
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 00:59:59 -0400:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf
>> >> wrote:
>>
Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:22:12 -0400:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 00:59:59 -0400:
> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >...
> >> > If yes, then we infer that no two in-repository
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 00:59:59 -0400:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>...
>> > If yes, then we infer that no two in-repository paths (which are
>> > bytewise different) canonicalize to the same byte s
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 00:59:59 -0400:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Erik Huelsmann wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:20:06 +0200:
> >> Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
> >> strings designating a certain path no
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Erik Huelsmann wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:20:06 +0200:
>> Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
>> strings designating a certain path not neccessarily being equal to other
>> strings designating the sa
Erik Huelsmann wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:20:06 +0200:
> Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
> strings designating a certain path not neccessarily being equal to other
> strings designating the same path. The issue has to do with NFC (composed)
> and NFD
Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
strings designating a certain path not neccessarily being equal to other
strings designating the same path. The issue has to do with NFC (composed)
and NFD (decomposed) representation of Unicode characters. CMike nicely
call
11 matches
Mail list logo