Re: USE_DB_PROPS define

2010-06-04 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 16:36, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:44, Hyrum K. Wright >> wrote: >> > To anybody concerned: >> > We currently use the USE_DB_PROPS define to filter out the experi

Re: USE_DB_PROPS define

2010-06-04 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:44, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: > > To anybody concerned: > > We currently use the USE_DB_PROPS define to filter out the experimental > use > > of exclusive in-db-properties. Since that wi

Re: USE_DB_PROPS define

2010-06-03 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:44, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > To anybody concerned: > We currently use the USE_DB_PROPS define to filter out the experimental use > of exclusive in-db-properties.  Since that will be implemented in format 17, > which is imminent as soon as Greg is home from

Re: USE_DB_PROPS define

2010-05-27 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
I made this change in r948899. -Hyrum On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Hyrum K. Wright < hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > To anybody concerned: > We currently use the USE_DB_PROPS define to filter out the experimental use > of exclusive in-db-properties. Since that will be

USE_DB_PROPS define

2010-05-26 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
To anybody concerned: We currently use the USE_DB_PROPS define to filter out the experimental use of exclusive in-db-properties. Since that will be implemented in format 17, which is imminent as soon as Greg is home from holiday, I'd like to change the defines from #ifndef USE_DB_PROPS to