Я писал в своём письме Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:50:37
+0300:
C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Sat, 30 Jan
2010 01:55:36 +0300:
Mark Phippard wrote:
2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
I meant the license file that you've just deleted, but I guess it's no
longer an issue. 8=]
Still:
1) The ref
C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Sat, 30 Jan
2010 01:55:36 +0300:
Mark Phippard wrote:
2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
I meant the license file that you've just deleted, but I guess it's no
longer an issue. 8=]
Still:
1) The reference to this file should be deleted from NOTICE.
2) Referen
C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Sat, 30 Jan
2010 00:22:34 +0300:
Mark Phippard wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:18 PM, C. Michael Pilato
wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote:
2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
Say, shouldn't that license file be moved deeper, into
subversion/bindings/swig/python/
Mark Phippard wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
>
>> I meant the license file that you've just deleted, but I guess it's no
>> longer an issue. 8=]
>>
>> Still:
>>
>> 1) The reference to this file should be deleted from NOTICE.
>> 2) References to LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS should be removed fr
2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
> I meant the license file that you've just deleted, but I guess it's no
> longer an issue. 8=]
>
> Still:
>
> 1) The reference to this file should be deleted from NOTICE.
> 2) References to LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS should be removed from the code
> in question and re
Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:18 PM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>> Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> 2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
>>>
Say, shouldn't that license file be moved deeper, into
subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/trac/?
>>> No. The proper ASF procedure is to note
Mark Phippard wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
>
>> Say, shouldn't that license file be moved deeper, into
>> subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/trac/?
>
> No. The proper ASF procedure is to note the additional license at the
> end of our LICENSE file as shown in the examples I provided ea
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I missed that, but I would agree. I do not think we should have
>> anything but LICENSE and NOTICE.
This appears to be the proper way to handle it within the files that
are licensed differently themselves:
http://svn.apache.org/repos
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:18 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> 2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
>>
>>> Say, shouldn't that license file be moved deeper, into
>>> subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/trac/?
>>
>> No. The proper ASF procedure is to note the additional license at the
2010/1/29 Роман Донченко :
> Say, shouldn't that license file be moved deeper, into
> subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/trac/?
No. The proper ASF procedure is to note the additional license at the
end of our LICENSE file as shown in the examples I provided earlier.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Fri, 29 Jan
2010 21:16:11 +0300:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato
wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
2010/1/29 Mark Phippard :
Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this
entirely
and add
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>> 2010/1/29 Mark Phippard :
>>> Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely
>>> and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root?
>> That's e
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> 2010/1/29 Mark Phippard :
>> Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely
>> and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root?
> That's even better!
Is there an exampl
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Mark Phippard :
> Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely
> and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root?
That's even better!
>>> Is there an example of this readily available. I'm pouring over
>>> http://www.apach
2010/1/29 Mark Phippard :
Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely
and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root?
>>>
>>> That's even better!
>>
>> Is there an example of this readily available. I'm pouring over
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/ and http://w
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:08 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> 2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato :
Роман Донченко wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
> 2010 17:57:17 +0300:
>> I'd be lying if I said I cared a li
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> 2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato :
>>> Роман Донченко wrote:
C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
2010 17:57:17 +0300:
> I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
> bindings *tests*. But un
Mark Phippard wrote:
> 2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato :
>> Роман Донченко wrote:
>>> C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
>>> 2010 17:57:17 +0300:
I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no rea
2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato :
> Роман Донченко wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
>> 2010 17:57:17 +0300:
>>> I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
>>> bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no reason for the
>>> bindings the
Роман Донченко wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
> 2010 17:57:17 +0300:
>> I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
>> bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no reason for the
>> bindings themselves to carry additional copyright
C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
2010 17:57:17 +0300:
David James wrote:
2010/1/18 Роман Донченко :
Also note that I want to eventually remove the trac directory and
integrate
non-duplicate tests from there into the "main" testsuite - albeit I'm
not
sure if I'm allowed
David James wrote:
> 2010/1/18 Роман Донченко :
>> Also note that I want to eventually remove the trac directory and integrate
>> non-duplicate tests from there into the "main" testsuite - albeit I'm not
>> sure if I'm allowed to do that. Maybe we can persuade Edgewall to formally
>> contribute tho
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> We still have in our tree (currently at
> trunk/www/license-for-python-bindings.html, but likely to be moved
> elsewhere) a special license for the Subversion Python bindings. The
> document claims that the copyright for the bindings is
2010/1/18 Роман Донченко :
> Also note that I want to eventually remove the trac directory and integrate
> non-duplicate tests from there into the "main" testsuite - albeit I'm not
> sure if I'm allowed to do that. Maybe we can persuade Edgewall to formally
> contribute those parts to ASF so we can
C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
2010 01:10:26 +0300:
We still have in our tree (currently at
trunk/www/license-for-python-bindings.html, but likely to be moved
elsewhere) a special license for the Subversion Python bindings. The
document claims that the copyright for the b
> I've not done much exploration here, but this seems odd to me. As far as I
> remembered, our Python bindings don't use any Trac software at all. I
> recall that we imported the Trac test framework some time ago, but I was
> under the impression that this was a limited dependency -- that the bin
We still have in our tree (currently at
trunk/www/license-for-python-bindings.html, but likely to be moved
elsewhere) a special license for the Subversion Python bindings. The
document claims that the copyright for the bindings is dually held by
CollabNet and by Edgewall (the folks behind Trac).
27 matches
Mail list logo
