Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 20:18:38 -0400:
> If we don't find the bugfix doable, then I think we can/should add the
> check that I researched above.
>
+1
On Apr 5, 2012 4:16 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>...
> Yeah, the alternative is to do it at compile-time and disallow
> the `--with-berkeley-db --with-apxs=2.4' combination --- even for people
> who don't have BDB repositories.
Not sure about this; I think the get_resource() fix would be preferabl
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 15:02:35 -0400:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:46, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
> >>> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Gre
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:46, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
>>> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
>>> > > On Apr
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
>> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>> >
>> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
>> > > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
>> wrote:
>> >
>>
Greg Stein writes:
> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>>
>> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
>> > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
> wrote:
>>
>> > >
>> > > I've raised issue 4157 to track this problem.
>> >
>> > Can we at least implement a dete
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >
> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
> > > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > I've raised issue 4157 to track this problem.
On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
> > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I've raised issue 4157 to track this problem.
> >
> > Can we at least implement a detection for this situation and fail
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
> On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin" wrote:
> >
> > Branko Čibej writes:
> >
> > >> ... I think I may have identified the problem. The patch below checks
> > >> that the error struct is allocated and released by the same thread.
> > >
On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin" wrote:
>
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
> >> ... I think I may have identified the problem. The patch below checks
> >> that the error struct is allocated and released by the same thread.
> >> With the worker MPM the assertion always passes but with the event MP
Branko Čibej writes:
>> ... I think I may have identified the problem. The patch below checks
>> that the error struct is allocated and released by the same thread.
>> With the worker MPM the assertion always passes but with the event MPM I
>> get assertion failures. I don't fully understand th
On 05.04.2012 00:44, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> I think there is a refcount/locking bug in svn_fs_bdb__close. This code
>>
>> - if (0 == --bdb_baton->error_info->refcount && bdb->pool)
>> -{
>> - svn_error_clear(bdb_baton->error_info->pending_errors);
>> -#if APR_
Philip Martin writes:
> I think there is a refcount/locking bug in svn_fs_bdb__close. This code
>
> - if (0 == --bdb_baton->error_info->refcount && bdb->pool)
> -{
> - svn_error_clear(bdb_baton->error_info->pending_errors);
> -#if APR_HAS_THREADS
> - free(bdb_baton->error_info);
>
Philip Martin writes:
> ==10434== Thread 15:
> ==10434== Invalid read of size 4
> ==10434==at 0x802D5BB: svn_fs_bdb__open_internal (env.c:660)
> ==10434==by 0x802D679: svn_fs_bdb__open (env.c:672)
> ==10434==by 0x80390D7: open_databases (fs.c:536)
> ==10434==by 0x8039C26: base_ope
Philip Martin writes:
> I'm not familiar with this code. I can "fix" the problem by removing
> the free() from svn_fs_bdb__close but that's not really surprising given
> the warnings above, nor is it a solution. The patch below also appears
> to fix the problem but I'm reluctant to commit it un
Philip Martin writes:
> ==10434== Thread 15:
> ==10434== Invalid read of size 4
> ==10434==at 0x802D5BB: svn_fs_bdb__open_internal (env.c:660)
> ==10434==by 0x802D679: svn_fs_bdb__open (env.c:672)
> ==10434==by 0x80390D7: open_databases (fs.c:536)
> ==10434==by 0x8039C26: base_ope
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 02.04.2012 18:46, Philip Martin wrote:
>> I am unable to run the Subversion regression tests for BDB and DAV with
>> Apache 2.4 using the event MPM (the new default MPM in 2.4). Sometimes
>> mod_dav_svn SEGVs causing tests to FAIL and sometimes the tests hang
>> with mo
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 21:04:36 +0200:
> On 02.04.2012 18:46, Philip Martin wrote:
> > I am unable to run the Subversion regression tests for BDB and DAV with
> > Apache 2.4 using the event MPM (the new default MPM in 2.4). Sometimes
> > mod_dav_svn SEGVs causing tests to FAIL
On 02.04.2012 18:46, Philip Martin wrote:
> I am unable to run the Subversion regression tests for BDB and DAV with
> Apache 2.4 using the event MPM (the new default MPM in 2.4). Sometimes
> mod_dav_svn SEGVs causing tests to FAIL and sometimes the tests hang
> with mod_dav_svn spinning in a loop.
I am unable to run the Subversion regression tests for BDB and DAV with
Apache 2.4 using the event MPM (the new default MPM in 2.4). Sometimes
mod_dav_svn SEGVs causing tests to FAIL and sometimes the tests hang
with mod_dav_svn spinning in a loop. The problems go away when I switch
to the worker
20 matches
Mail list logo
