Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/21/2012 04:08 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > I think that we should reduce number of PROPFINDs in checkout/update > over ra_serf somehow before releasing 1.8. I think we've found Ivan's drum. :-) -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development signat

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/21/2012 04:08 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > I think that we should reduce number of PROPFINDs in checkout/update > over ra_serf somehow before releasing 1.8. I think we've found Ivan's drum. :-) -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development signat

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 13:13:46 -0500: > Daniel Shahaf wrote on 06/21/2012 12:57:46 PM: > > > > > Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable > building > > > > > mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing > > > httpd.h, > >

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hey all, > > Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are > on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, "can we ship trunk > today?" The answer was "no" for three specific items: > > * local moves are kinda broken (thu

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 21, 2012 7:00 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 13:37:14 -0400: > > ... > > I'm just wondering if we can get a handle on the precise things that > > need to be completed, fixed, or backed out. We've been coding without > > What I had in mind was just te

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread kmradke
Daniel Shahaf wrote on 06/21/2012 12:57:46 PM: > > > > Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building > > > > mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing > > httpd.h, > > > > error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround. > > > > > >

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 13:37:14 -0400: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:40 -0400: > >> Hey all, > >> > >> Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are > >> on that. For a thought e

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:36:29 -0500: > > From: Daniel Shahaf > > > Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building > > > mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing > httpd.h, > > > error, so I pointed it to my local bui

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:40 -0400: >> Hey all, >> >> Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are >> on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, "can we ship trunk >> today?" > > There have bee

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread kmradke
> From: Daniel Shahaf > > Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building > > mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing httpd.h, > > error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround. > > > > httpd 2.2 or 2.4? I pointed it to 2.2.22 as

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:09:46 -0500: > Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building > mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing httpd.h, > error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround. > httpd 2

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:40 -0400: > Hey all, > > Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are > on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, "can we ship trunk > today?" There have been 3-4 new FSFS features in 1.8 (incremental hotcopy, dir deltifi

RE: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Mark Moe
> Can/should we focus on fixing these and shipping sooner rather than > later? Are there items that should/must go into 1.8 that aren't on > deck today? I would really like to see #4176 resolved in v1.7.x or v1.8.x. It's a major issue for us and our usage of svn (wc-ng) working copies on network

Re: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread kmradke
> Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are > on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, "can we ship trunk > today?" The answer was "no" for three specific items: > > * local moves are kinda broken (thus: fix or roll back) > * svnrdump does not work over ra_serf (mo

Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Greg Stein
Hey all, Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, "can we ship trunk today?" The answer was "no" for three specific items: * local moves are kinda broken (thus: fix or roll back) * svnrdump does not work over ra_serf (move