re is the patch file again as a .txt file.
>>
>> Joe Rozner
>>
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Joe Rozner [mailto:j...@deadbytes.net]
>>>> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 20
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> Applied in r957507. I noticed the patch was against 1.6.12, but it
> applied cleanly to trunk. In the future, please make patches against
> trunk (and hopefully include a log message).
>
> Should this be backported to the 1.6.x branch?
>
juni 2010 5:43
>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
>>>
>>> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to
>>> changes in the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue.
&g
er [mailto:j...@deadbytes.net]
>> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 5:43
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
>>
>> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to
>> changes in the case syntax. Here is a pa
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Rozner [mailto:j...@deadbytes.net]
> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 5:43
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
>
> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to
&g
The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to changes in
the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue.
Joe Rozner
j...@deadbytes.net
6 matches
Mail list logo