Re: Ruby bindings asserting on fspaths

2011-02-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Okay, I've fixed a problem in libsvn_repos. And I've reworked this test into something at least ... meaningful. On 02/08/2011 03:20 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Yeesh. I find Ruby incredibly difficult to read, but I'm fairly certain > that this test is bogus in many ways. The "target" passed

Re: Ruby bindings asserting on fspaths

2011-02-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Yeesh. I find Ruby incredibly difficult to read, but I'm fairly certain that this test is bogus in many ways. The "target" passed to svn_repos_begin_report() was never supposed to be anything but a relpath. From it's docstring: @a target is a single path component, used to limit the scope of

Re: Ruby bindings asserting on fspaths

2011-02-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
I'll look into these. On 02/08/2011 11:36 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > The buildbot is red: > > http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu%20gcc/builds/1514/steps/Test%20bindings/logs/stdio > > The Ruby bindings are triggering the new fspath asserts. The problem occurs > in > test_report and

Ruby bindings asserting on fspaths

2011-02-08 Thread Philip Martin
The buildbot is red: http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu%20gcc/builds/1514/steps/Test%20bindings/logs/stdio The Ruby bindings are triggering the new fspath asserts. The problem occurs in test_report and test_report2 in: subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_repos.rb I can fix the as