On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Hi, Stefan,
>
> Von: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com]
> >> What's the performance penalty for modifying a packed rev props? From
> what you've said, it sounds like packing works by fitting as many rev props
> into a 64k
Hi, Stefan,
Von: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com]
>> What's the performance penalty for modifying a packed rev props? From what
>> you've said, it sounds like packing works by fitting as many rev props into
>> a 64k chunk, so, let's say I've got a million rev repository. A
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Trent Nelson wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>
> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> > and finally implemented revprop packing
>
> Lots of tools, like svnsync, store metadata in r0 rev props. Could this
> rev be excluded from packing?
>
It is exclu
Hi Stefan,
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing
Lots of tools, like svnsync, store metadata in r0 rev props. Could this
rev be excluded from packing?
What's the performance penalty for modifying a packed rev props? From
what you'v
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Philip Martin <
> philip.mar...@wandisco.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> >>
> >> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> >> > and finally implem
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>
>> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>>
>> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
>> > and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
>> > offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty
Effing gmail :(
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> > and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> > offline). It passes all t
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> > and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> > offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
>
> There are buildbot failure
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
There are buildbot failures, I don't know if they are caused by the
packing code. valgrind
.@wandisco.com]
> *Sent:* vrijdag 6 juli 2012 10:32
> *To:* Subversion Development
> *Subject:* Revprop packing implemented
>
> ** **
>
> Hi devs,
>
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that ma
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 7/6/12 6:27 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>> On 07/06/2012 04:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
>>> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
>>> off
pack, depending on
how large the log messages usually are.
Does such a small pack size have specific benefits?
Bert
From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com]
Sent: vrijdag 6 juli 2012 10:32
To: Subversion Development
Subject: Revprop packing implem
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
>
> It's design deviates from the existing revprop
On 7/6/12 6:27 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 07/06/2012 04:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi devs,
This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
Cool!
[...]
Sinc
On 07/06/2012 04:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
Cool!
[...]
> Since the new code will not be used unles
Hi devs,
This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
It's design deviates from the existing revprop packing branch
in that it is more scalable and simpler to implement
16 matches
Mail list logo
