On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:57:07AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I would prefer
> if those trying to fix merge would think more about tree conflict resolution
> than anything else.
Oh, and BTW, those who are new to the project and would like to learn
more about the subject of tree conflicts, my
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:02:10AM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hi Mergeans,
>
> One of main sources for merge conflicts in SVN
> is its inability to follow renames. Philip and
> (the other) Stefan already made some attempts to
> solve that issue on the client side:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/r
Hi Stefan,
Mind a couple of questions from potential user of this feature?
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 01:02:10 am Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> * "continue" from-path[@peg] [ from-rev ] to-path
>Specifies that the merge-relevant change history
>of from-path,from-rev is continued by to-path,
>
Hi Stefan.
Overall comment: yes, I think something like this could form the basis of a
data storage for tracking renames.
We should think a bit more about how we would expect this to be used initially
-- whether we make 'svn copy' and/or 'svn move' populate this data, or provide
some other UI
Hi Mergeans,
One of main sources for merge conflicts in SVN
is its inability to follow renames. Philip and
(the other) Stefan already made some attempts to
solve that issue on the client side:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/moves-scan-log/BRANCH-README
After some discussion
5 matches
Mail list logo
