Gavin Beau Baumanis writes:
> Ping. This submission has not received any further comments.
>
> Specifically, Noorul seems to be after comments about "this";
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-01/0537.shtml , post.
>
>
> On 14/02/2011, at 6:41 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Noorul Islam K M
Ping. This submission has not received any further comments.
Specifically, Noorul seems to be after comments about "this";
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-01/0537.shtml , post.
On 14/02/2011, at 6:41 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>
>> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>>
>
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 23:14:10 +:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> hwright noorul: ignored_props_mod takes a list
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 23:14:10 +:
>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>> > hwright noorul: ignored_props_mod takes a list of properties, yes (as
>>> > op
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 23:14:10 +:
>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>> > hwright noorul: ignored_props_mod takes a list of properties, yes (as
>> > opposed to a blanket "ignore all pr
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 23:14:10 +:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> > hwright noorul: ignored_props_mod takes a list of properties, yes (as
> > opposed to a blanket "ignore all prop mods")
> >
> > hwright what you are saying
> > is
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> "noorul Islam. Kamal Malmiyoda" writes:
>
>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:39 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
Is ignored_prop_mods list functionality completely implemented?
>>>
"noorul Islam. Kamal Malmiyoda" writes:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:39 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>>
>>> Is ignored_prop_mods list functionality completely implemented?
>>
>> Not yet. I've got all the boiler-plate done, but have not y
On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:39 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>
>> Is ignored_prop_mods list functionality completely implemented?
>
> Not yet. I've got all the boiler-plate done, but have not yet added
> the extra filtering in libsvn_repos. B
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
> Is ignored_prop_mods list functionality completely implemented?
Not yet. I've got all the boiler-plate done, but have not yet added
the extra filtering in libsvn_repos. Because 'log' is a small part of
the overall feature set, and I'm
I'm not Hyrum, but the log messages on the branch showed a list of
propnames that are to be ignored, so I assume this *will* be handled.
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 17:59:15 +0530:
> Is ignored_prop_mods list functionality completely implemented?
>
> I assume that we can set an
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M
>>> wrote:
>>>
Daniel Becroft writes:
> On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>
>>> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>>>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M
wrote:
> Daniel Becroft writes:
>
>> On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noor
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>
>>> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>>>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M
wrote:
> Daniel Becroft writes:
>
>> On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noor
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M
>>> wrote:
>>>
Daniel Becroft writes:
> On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Becroft writes:
>>>
On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to work on issue 36
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Daniel Becroft writes:
>>
>>> On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
few questions.
1. H
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Daniel Becroft writes:
>
>> On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
>>> few questions.
>>>
>>> 1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment
Daniel Becroft writes:
> On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
>> few questions.
>>
>> 1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment stating that already there
>> is work going on in the branch ign
On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
> few questions.
>
> 1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment stating that already there
> is work going on in the branch ignore-mergeinfo which addresses
> s
Good points Johan,
For those interested;
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3690
Issue text;
Add an option to ignore files with only property changes and no content changes.
e.g. svn log --ignore-properties
Motivation: many users are not interested in reviewing changes to prope
Johan Corveleyn writes:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
>> few questions.
>>
>> 1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment stating that already there
>> is work going on in the bran
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
> few questions.
>
> 1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment stating that already there
> is work going on in the branch ignore-mergeinfo which addresses
>
Hi,
I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
few questions.
1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment stating that already there
is work going on in the branch ignore-mergeinfo which addresses
subset of issue 3690, i.e ignoring changes to svn:mergeinfo. Is
24 matches
Mail list logo
