On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:46 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> David Glasser wrote:
Is the attached patch what you had in mind? (Plus similar logic for FSFS,
of course.)
>>> Ah, yes, that's what I meant; that patch looks great, assuming it
>>> works :)
>>
>> I'l
Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 09:46 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> David Glasser wrote:
> Is the attached patch what you had in mind? (Plus similar logic
> for FSFS,
> of course.)
Ah, yes, that's what I meant; that patch looks great, assuming it
On 03/22/2010 12:56 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
My name isn't David, but I now have 50+ repositories with 8.7 million revisions
between them exposed via a Thrift-like API of svn_fs that anybody can modify
the filesystem in any order, so it if a
On Mar 22, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> My name isn't David, but I now have 50+ repositories with 8.7 million
> revisions between them exposed via a Thrift-like API of svn_fs that anybody
> can modify the filesystem in any order, so it if a user could make a
> particular set of modif
On 03/22/2010 09:46 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
David Glasser wrote:
Is the attached patch what you had in mind? (Plus similar logic for FSFS,
of course.)
Ah, yes, that's what I meant; that patch looks great, assuming it
works :)
I'll try to polish this up, add the
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> David Glasser wrote:
>>> Is the attached patch what you had in mind? (Plus similar logic for FSFS,
>>> of course.)
>> Ah, yes, that's what I meant; that patch looks great, assuming it
>> works :)
>
> I'll try to polish this up, add the FSFS flavor, and add a regression
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:04:45PM -0700, David Glasser wrote:
> I would like to get a working Subversion development
> environment back one of these days, once I re-derive how to work
> around the Debian libtool issue again...
Compile your own APR libs from source, and svn will use APR's libtool.
David Glasser wrote:
>> Is the attached patch what you had in mind? (Plus similar logic for FSFS,
>> of course.)
>
> Ah, yes, that's what I meant; that patch looks great, assuming it
> works :)
I'll try to polish this up, add the FSFS flavor, and add a regression test
when I get some time. Than
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> David Glasser wrote:
>> When dealing with some nasty cases in the almost-retired old Google
>> Code subversion backend, I found a kind of data corruption that the FS
>> code wasn't catching even though it caught relatively similar issues
David Glasser wrote:
> When dealing with some nasty cases in the almost-retired old Google
> Code subversion backend, I found a kind of data corruption that the FS
> code wasn't catching even though it caught relatively similar issues.
> Specifically, find the fold_change function in both of the FS
10 matches
Mail list logo
