On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Note that I don't disagree with the mtcc change/fix.
>
> But I think we must fix the reason why this pattern causes problems in
> fsfs, fsx, etc.
>
Well, as already pointed out, apr pools default to strict LIFO.
The good thing about this is
ben"
Sent: 05/01/2014 09:51
To: "Branko Čibej" ; "Subversion Development"
Subject: RE: svn
commit:r1555350-/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c
While I agree that the mtcc code needs review and tweaks, many other arguments
here would equally be valid t
2 matches
Mail list logo
