Re: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-20 Thread Branko Čibej
On 15.09.2010 21:03, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99 >>> where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was starte

Re: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-15 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: >>  On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99 >> > where the benefits are desirable? When Subvers

Re: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99 > > where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about > > a decade old, and C99 is ju

Re: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:47:39PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > > Sent: vrijdag 10 september 2010 15:26 > > To: Bert Huijben > > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99 > > where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about > > a decade old, and C99 is ju

RE: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: vrijdag 10 september 2010 15:26 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r995475 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c > > On Thu,

Re: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote: > I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99 > where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about > a decade old, and C99 is just as old now... Microsoft's C compiler, to name only one, still does

Re: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:58:10PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote: > > @@ -524,9 +524,11 @@ parse_property_block(svn_stream_t *strea > >else if ((buf[0] == 'D') && (buf[1] == ' ')) > > { > >char *keybuf; > > + apr_int64_t len; > > > > + SVN_ERR(svn_cstring

RE: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: s...@apache.org [mailto:s...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 17:52 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r995475 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c > > Author: stsp > Date: Thu Sep 9 15:51:34 2010 > New R