Re: svn commit: r959257 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c

2010-07-01 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:41, Philip Martin wrote: > Greg Stein writes: > >> Dood. Re-read my email. I said interim wq items do not have to be supported. >> Only 1.7 [release] items. > > So when do we autoupgrade? > > 1.7-dev to 1.7-dev > > I disabled the autoupgrade with a workqueue as it might

Re: svn commit: r959257 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c

2010-07-01 Thread Philip Martin
Greg Stein writes: > Dood. Re-read my email. I said interim wq items do not have to be supported. > Only 1.7 [release] items. So when do we autoupgrade? 1.7-dev to 1.7-dev I disabled the autoupgrade with a workqueue as it might break. Developers have to run cleanup with an older client. I'm

Re: svn commit: r959257 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c

2010-07-01 Thread Greg Stein
Dood. Re-read my email. I said interim wq items do not have to be supported. Only 1.7 [release] items. On Jul 1, 2010 5:08 AM, "Philip Martin" wrote: Greg Stein writes: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 13:55, Philip Martin >> We allow the >>> upgrade to continue. If there is an impact on work queue i

Re: svn commit: r959257 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c

2010-07-01 Thread Philip Martin
Greg Stein writes: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 13:55, Philip Martin > wrote: >> Greg Stein writes: >> >>> I completely disagree with this. >>> >>> Didn't I just get done describing the intent here? >> >> You didn't respond to my questions in the last thread. > > Gee. I'm sorry. I have a life. I

Re: svn commit: r959257 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c

2010-06-30 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 13:55, Philip Martin wrote: > Greg Stein writes: > >> I completely disagree with this. >> >> Didn't I just get done describing the intent here? > > You didn't respond to my questions in the last thread. Gee. I'm sorry. I have a life. I don't have time to respond to everyt

Re: svn commit: r959257 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c

2010-06-30 Thread Philip Martin
Greg Stein writes: > I completely disagree with this. > > Didn't I just get done describing the intent here? You didn't respond to my questions in the last thread. > We allow the > upgrade to continue. If there is an impact on work queue items, then > they must be upgraded, too. We don't gener

Re: svn commit: r959257 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c

2010-06-30 Thread Greg Stein
I completely disagree with this. Didn't I just get done describing the intent here? We allow the upgrade to continue. If there is an impact on work queue items, then they must be upgraded, too. Clients are not expected to back up to previous revisions and run "svn cleanup". We ONLY plan to requir