Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 18:50:59 +0300:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 17:43:22 +0200:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 06:15:29PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > I don't think checking for ruby20 ruby2.0 ruby19 ruby1.9 ruby18 ruby1.8
> > > is too much of a problem
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 17:43:22 +0200:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 06:15:29PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > I don't think checking for ruby20 ruby2.0 ruby19 ruby1.9 ruby18 ruby1.8
> > is too much of a problem. We already do this for some other
> > dependencies:
>
> OK, then
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 06:15:29PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I don't think checking for ruby20 ruby2.0 ruby19 ruby1.9 ruby18 ruby1.8
> is too much of a problem. We already do this for some other
> dependencies:
OK, then let's make it do what Arfrever suggested:
AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 17:07:35 +0200:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 05:57:26PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 16:21:53 +0200:
> > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > > s...@apache.org wrote on Sun,
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 05:57:26PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 16:21:53 +0200:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> > > > -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 16:21:53 +0200:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> > > -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8 ruby18 ruby, none)
> > > +AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby, none)
> >
>
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> > -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8 ruby18 ruby, none)
> > +AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby, none)
>
> Could you re-add ruby1.8? I added it because in some environment I had
s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8 ruby18 ruby, none)
> +AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby, none)
Could you re-add ruby1.8? I added it because in some environment I had
no 'ruby' binary but did have a 'ruby1.8' binary...
8 matches
Mail list logo