On Wednesday 22 June 2011 02:43 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
Hi Arwin,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
3. Will this feature be considered at all (if it is any good) or am I simply
doing something to exercise my brain cells?
Actually, I think it'd be a good idea to have a stan
Hi Arwin,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
> 3. Will this feature be considered at all (if it is any good) or am I simply
> doing something to exercise my brain cells?
Actually, I think it'd be a good idea to have a standardized command
to have where all clients work alike.
W
So, to summarize, the motivations are
* doesn't require perl/python on Windows
* doesn't require third party scripts / extra packages on Unix
* useable by API clients
* canonical implementation
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:03:22 +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:55:15PM +030
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:29:24 +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:15:06PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am currently trying to implement "svn bisect" subcommand. Yes, I
> > know there are some good scripts out there that work, but it's not
> > part of our
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 03:11 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:37 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
There are alr
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:55:15PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:34:46 +0200:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:21:27PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
> > >
> > > There are already THREE s
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:34:46 +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:21:27PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
> >
> > There are already THREE scripts out there that implement cmdline 'svn
> > bisect':
> > one on CPA
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:37 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>
> >> Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
> >>
> >> There are already THREE scripts out there that
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>
>> Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
>>
>> There are already THREE scripts out there that implement cmdline 'svn
>> bisect':
>> one on CPAN, one in Peter's Deb
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:21:27PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
>
> There are already THREE scripts out there that implement cmdline 'svn bisect':
> one on CPAN, one in Peter's Debian package, one that Julian just posted.
> (And we got
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
There are already THREE scripts out there that implement cmdline 'svn bisect':
one on CPAN, one in Peter's Debian package, one that Julian just posted.
(And we got one sent to the
Please convince me why having svn_client_bisect() is needed.
There are already THREE scripts out there that implement cmdline 'svn bisect':
one on CPAN, one in Peter's Debian package, one that Julian just posted.
(And we got one sent to the issue tracker a while ago, but the CPAN one
was more feat
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:40:10PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:35 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:26:28PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> >>>Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I'd like to offer you commit access to a branch in our repository
> so you work
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:35 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:26:28PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
I'd like to offer you commit access to a branch in our repository
so you work on this there if you like.
I'd really appreciate that. Thanks for the suppor
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:26:28PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> >Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >>I'd like to offer you commit access to a branch in our repository
> >>so you work on this there if you like.
> I'd really appreciate that. Thanks for the support.
Good, I'll fire off an account request.
Do yo
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:00:40AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> My patch retrieves the list of operative revisions on the specified
> subtree, and binary-searches through that list, not through all possible
> revision numbers.
Nice. I didn't read it thoroughly enough so :-)
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:35:54AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Here's one I wrote a few months back. I didn't send it here because I
> > didn't think it was a serious proposition, just something fun to
> > exercise my brain cells. :-)
> >
> > One thing "git bisect" doe
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:05 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
Here's one I wrote a few months back. I didn't send it here because I
didn't think it was a serious proposition, just something fun to
exercise my brain cells. :-)
One thing "git bisect" does that's not implemented here is to support a
third
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:35:54AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> Here's one I wrote a few months back. I didn't send it here because I
> didn't think it was a serious proposition, just something fun to
> exercise my brain cells. :-)
>
> One thing "git bisect" does that's not implemented here is to
Here's one I wrote a few months back. I didn't send it here because I
didn't think it was a serious proposition, just something fun to
exercise my brain cells. :-)
One thing "git bisect" does that's not implemented here is to support a
third response, "unable to test", and skip such revisions.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:15:06PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am currently trying to implement "svn bisect" subcommand. Yes, I
> know there are some good scripts out there that work, but it's not
> part of our API. I figured this would be a decent addition to our
> code. Here are a f
21 matches
Mail list logo
