On Oct 30, 2014, at 3:52 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 05:47, Sean Leonard wrote:
>> On Oct 26, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>>> On 26.10.2014 16:06, Sean Leonard wrote:
On 10/26/2014 3:21 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.10.2014 05:49, Sean Leonard wrote:
>>
On 30.10.2014 05:47, Sean Leonard wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 26.10.2014 16:06, Sean Leonard wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2014 3:21 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 26.10.2014 05:49, Sean Leonard wrote:
> On 10/25/2014 5:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 25.10.2
On Oct 26, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.10.2014 16:06, Sean Leonard wrote:
>> On 10/26/2014 3:21 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 26.10.2014 05:49, Sean Leonard wrote:
On 10/25/2014 5:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 25.10.2014 20:53, Sean Leonard wrote:
>> It appears
On 27.10.2014 18:45, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 10/26/14 11:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> The fact that the svn:mime-type property is usable in any way for
>> serving content from the repository is more or less an accident; it's
>> definitely not a design goal. What you propose would have zero benefit
>
On 10/26/14 11:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> The fact that the svn:mime-type property is usable in any way for
> serving content from the repository is more or less an accident; it's
> definitely not a design goal. What you propose would have zero benefit
> for Subversion as a version control system
On 10/26/14 11:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> The fact that the svn:mime-type property is usable in any way for
> serving content from the repository is more or less an accident; it's
> definitely not a design goal. What you propose would have zero benefit
> for Subversion as a version control system
On 26.10.2014 16:06, Sean Leonard wrote:
> On 10/26/2014 3:21 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 26.10.2014 05:49, Sean Leonard wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2014 5:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 25.10.2014 20:53, Sean Leonard wrote:
> It appears that the matter was not fully resolved. svn:charset seems
>
On 10/26/2014 3:21 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 26.10.2014 05:49, Sean Leonard wrote:
On 10/25/2014 5:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 25.10.2014 20:53, Sean Leonard wrote:
It appears that the matter was not fully resolved. svn:charset seems
to enjoy de-facto use.
If anyone is using svn:charset, t
On 26.10.2014 05:49, Sean Leonard wrote:
> On 10/25/2014 5:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 25.10.2014 20:53, Sean Leonard wrote:
>>> It appears that the matter was not fully resolved. svn:charset seems
>>> to enjoy de-facto use.
>> If anyone is using svn:charset, they're violating our rules. The s
On 10/25/2014 5:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 25.10.2014 20:53, Sean Leonard wrote:
It appears that the matter was not fully resolved. svn:charset seems
to enjoy de-facto use.
If anyone is using svn:charset, they're violating our rules. The svn:
namespace is reserved for property names defined
On 25.10.2014 20:53, Sean Leonard wrote:
> It appears that the matter was not fully resolved. svn:charset seems
> to enjoy de-facto use.
If anyone is using svn:charset, they're violating our rules. The svn:
namespace is reserved for property names defined by Subversion, and
we've not defined that
11 matches
Mail list logo