On 2016-10-18 17:01 (-0400), Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Branko Äibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 13:08:37 +0200:
> >> It is. I don't think there's any way we can /not/ make it backwards
> >> incompatible, given the current implement
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 13:08:37 +0200:
>> It is. I don't think there's any way we can /not/ make it backwards
>> incompatible, given the current implementation. Which is why I think we
>> should just admit that current beh
On 18.10.2016 19:10, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 18.10.2016 18:46, Martin Edgar Furter Rathod wrote:
>> On 10/18/16 16:38, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 18.10.2016 12:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:06:32 +0200:
> If we change the behaviour so that a rule f
On 18.10.2016 18:46, Martin Edgar Furter Rathod wrote:
> On 10/18/16 16:38, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 18.10.2016 12:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:06:32 +0200:
If we change the behaviour so that a rule for a (case-insensitive)
pattern completely
On 10/18/16 16:38, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 18.10.2016 12:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:06:32 +0200:
If we change the behaviour so that a rule for a (case-insensitive)
pattern completely overrides a hierarchically previoius rule, we can
also introduce the
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 13:08:37 +0200:
> It is. I don't think there's any way we can /not/ make it backwards
> incompatible, given the current implementation. Which is why I think we
> should just admit that current behaviour is a bug.
>
> Either that, or introduce a new proper
On 18.10.2016 12:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:06:32 +0200:
>> If we change the behaviour so that a rule for a (case-insensitive)
>> pattern completely overrides a hierarchically previoius rule, we can
>> also introduce the concept of disabling auto-props
On 10/18/2016 12:29 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:06:32 +0200:
On 18.10.2016 09:32, Stefan wrote:
On 10/17/2016 15:37, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 17.10.2016 14:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:35 +0200:
Omitting
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:06:32 +0200:
> On 18.10.2016 09:32, Stefan wrote:
> > On 10/17/2016 15:37, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> On 17.10.2016 14:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:35 +0200:
> Omitting the '=' also doesn't cut it
On 10/18/2016 12:06 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 18.10.2016 09:32, Stefan wrote:
On 10/17/2016 15:37, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 17.10.2016 14:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:35 +0200:
Omitting the '=' also doesn't cut it:
[[[
C:\autoprops\wc\trunk\dir>
On 18.10.2016 09:32, Stefan wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 15:37, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 17.10.2016 14:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:35 +0200:
Omitting the '=' also doesn't cut it:
[[[
C:\autoprops\wc\trunk\dir>svn pg svn:auto-props
On 10/17/2016 15:37, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.10.2016 14:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:35 +0200:
>>> Omitting the '=' also doesn't cut it:
>>>
>>> [[[
>>> C:\autoprops\wc\trunk\dir>svn pg svn:auto-props --show-inherited-props
>>> C:\autoprops\wc
On 17.10.2016 14:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:35 +0200:
>> Omitting the '=' also doesn't cut it:
>>
>> [[[
>> C:\autoprops\wc\trunk\dir>svn pg svn:auto-props --show-inherited-props
>> C:\autoprops\wc - *.txt = svn:eol-style=native
>>
>> C:\autoprops
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:35 +0200:
> Omitting the '=' also doesn't cut it:
>
> [[[
> C:\autoprops\wc\trunk\dir>svn pg svn:auto-props --show-inherited-props
> C:\autoprops\wc - *.txt = svn:eol-style=native
>
> C:\autoprops\wc\trunk - *.txt =
> svn:eol-style;svn:mime-type
[ dropped users@, added Paul Burba and Julian Foad, who have worked on
the inherited-props / repos-dictated-config features in the past, and
might have an educated opinion on this :-) ]
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> [ moving to dev@; please reply to dev@ only ]
>
> Joh
15 matches
Mail list logo
