Re: revert behaviour in the light of layered working copy changes

2010-10-12 Thread Julian Foad
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 17:04 +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > Erik Huelsmann writes: > > > This is why I'm now proposing that we stop to leave behind the > > -unchanged- files which are part of a copy or move operation. > > That sounds reasonable to me. I'd be surprised if making a versioned > copy

Re: revert behaviour in the light of layered working copy changes

2010-10-12 Thread Philip Martin
Erik Huelsmann writes: > This is why I'm now proposing that we stop to leave behind the > -unchanged- files which are part of a copy or move operation. That sounds reasonable to me. I'd be surprised if making a versioned copy and then using revert to make it unversioned is something that users