Re: maunal WC upgrade test fallout

2012-11-02 Thread Ben Reser
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > During the SVN Live conferences I asked people, privately, about their > opinion on automatic vs. manual upgrades. The overwhelming response was > that they wait for all the clients to catch up before upgrading. Given > these results, my opinio

Re: maunal WC upgrade test fallout

2012-11-02 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/02/2012 01:15 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.11.2012 15:15, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> What would have been more interesting to know is how they felt about the >> required one-time manual 'svn upgrade' in 1.7 -- was it troublesome for >> their processes? > > I got exactly one response abou

Re: maunal WC upgrade test fallout

2012-11-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.11.2012 15:15, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 11/02/2012 09:07 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 02.11.2012 04:34, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:59:10AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: I went ahead and disabled auto-upgrades in r1404856. >> During the SVN Live conference

Re: maunal WC upgrade test fallout

2012-11-02 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/02/2012 09:07 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.11.2012 04:34, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:59:10AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> I went ahead and disabled auto-upgrades in r1404856. > > During the SVN Live conferences I asked people, privately, about their > opinio

Re: maunal WC upgrade test fallout

2012-11-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.11.2012 04:34, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:59:10AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> I went ahead and disabled auto-upgrades in r1404856. During the SVN Live conferences I asked people, privately, about their opinion on automatic vs. manual upgrades. The overwhelming r