Re: having revprops (eg svn:log) in start-commit

2012-08-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 14:23:39 -0400: > On 08/22/2012 02:02 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 22.08.2012 18:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > >> * besides, philip's freeze/unfreeze offers a far more logical way to > >> get honest-to-goodness-read-only-ness. > > > > The only c

Re: having revprops (eg svn:log) in start-commit

2012-08-22 Thread Branko Čibej
On 22.08.2012 21:29, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM, C. Michael Pilato > wrote: > ... >> * besides, philip's freeze/unfreeze offers a far more logical way to >> get honest-to-goodness-read-only-ness. > Like I asked in the thread about the freeze/unfreeze feature: what

Re: having revprops (eg svn:log) in start-commit

2012-08-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: ... > * besides, philip's freeze/unfreeze offers a far more logical way to > get honest-to-goodness-read-only-ness. Like I asked in the thread about the freeze/unfreeze feature: what happens to a client committing to a frozen repository?

Re: having revprops (eg svn:log) in start-commit

2012-08-22 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 08/22/2012 02:02 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 22.08.2012 18:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> * besides, philip's freeze/unfreeze offers a far more logical way to >> get honest-to-goodness-read-only-ness. > > The only caveat here being that using repo freeze could not be used > instead of start

Re: having revprops (eg svn:log) in start-commit

2012-08-22 Thread Branko Čibej
On 22.08.2012 18:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > * besides, philip's freeze/unfreeze offers a far more logical way to > get honest-to-goodness-read-only-ness. The only caveat here being that using repo freeze could not be used instead of start-commit blocking commits whilst importing code from a

Re: having revprops (eg svn:log) in start-commit

2012-08-22 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:28 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Bert asked the question of what would trigger the new start-commit behavior > -- upgrade to 1.8? A format bump for the repository? Personally, I lean > towards just the 1.8 upgrade. I don't feel like this only justifies a > format bu

Re: having revprops (eg svn:log) in start-commit

2012-08-22 Thread C. Michael Pilato
After IRC conversation between myself, brane, markphip, stsp, danielsh, and (to a less degree) julianf, I think I have a clear path forward on this now. The general sentiments are: * that 'start-commit' is today useful for making a repository "truly read-only" (as in, not modifiable at all) is