On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
[...]
>> The argument is that a Subversion server should be enforcing
>> Subversion's invariants.
>>
>> That said, I'm not opposed to doing it via standard hooks. It's a good
>> w
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: maandag 10 december 2012 8:04
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: enforcing LF-normalization for svn:eol-style=native files (issue
> #4065)
>
> On 10.12.2012 07:35, Bert Hu
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:51:08 +0100:
>> On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
>> >> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> >>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:51:08 +0100:
> On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
> >> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> >>> wrote:
> Johan Cor
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
>>> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wro
On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
>> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>>> wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
> 2) Am I the
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> >> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
> >>> 2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository
On 10.12.2012 07:35, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I don’t think you have to wait until commit time: You could verify the
> commit base revision’s properties + changes. In the cases where the
> properties change before commit, the commit would fail for being out of
> date.
That would imply you can't chang
:* dev@subversion.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: enforcing LF-normalization for svn:eol-style=native files
(issue #4065)
On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
>>>
On 10.12.2012 01:25, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Another known offender is git-svn, because they don't care about
> translating line termination. So if you use git-svn on Windows, you
> might end up committing an eol-style=native file with CRLF's in to the
> repository.
Yuck. We should shout *really*
On 10.12.2012 01:24, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Well, if we really want to implement such a feature,
> we may as well be a bit more clever about it: While
> writing incoming file contents to the protrev file, we
> may determine its NL style as we go and store the
> result. The latter could then be co
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository against
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
> >>> 2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository agains
On 10.12.2012 00:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> As for my 1st concern, about the slowness of the pre-commit hook
>> validation, it might be possible to make it faster if both 'svnlook
>> pg' and 'svnlook cat' would support multiple targets.
> Or if you wrote your hook script using the Python bindings.
On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
>>> 2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository against this
>>> corruption? Judging from [1], I don't think so. It d
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:08:26 +0100:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
> >> 2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository against this
> >> corruption? Judging from [1], I
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
>> 2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository against this
>> corruption? Judging from [1], I don't think so. It doesn't make sense
>> that everyone starts writing th
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
> 2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository against this
> corruption? Judging from [1], I don't think so. It doesn't make sense
> that everyone starts writing this pre-commit hook, for something that
> IMHO is an obvious
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 09.12.2012 09:14, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:02:55 +0100:
>>> Last week a colleague managed to commit a non-LF-normalized
>>> svn:eol-style=native file in our repository again. As explained in
>
On 09.12.2012 09:14, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:02:55 +0100:
>> Last week a colleague managed to commit a non-LF-normalized
>> svn:eol-style=native file in our repository again. As explained in
>> issue #4065 [1], this causes all kinds of problems.
>>
>>
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:02:55 +0100:
> Last week a colleague managed to commit a non-LF-normalized
> svn:eol-style=native file in our repository again. As explained in
> issue #4065 [1], this causes all kinds of problems.
>
> I suspect there might be a bug in SVNKit, some
21 matches
Mail list logo
