Ben Reser wrote on Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 21:27:40 -0700:
> Probably should fix 1.7.x to not try to use the none command when ruby
> isn't detected and to emit a proper error message.
FWIW, this is reproducible in trunk,
% RUBY=none ./configure
% make
% make swig-rb
I've looked into a patch. Att
On Thu Aug 15 21:05:40 2013, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/9201
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/6270
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave f
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:10 PM, wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/6234
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave f
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> Incidentally, I'm still seeing swig-pl build errors on that bot. From
> reading above, I thought these were addressed. Is that correct?
The latest failure is on the 1.7 branch which doesn't have the swig-pl
patch from trunk.
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> For the time being, the Ruby build step and tests have been commented
>> out of the relevant scripts.
>>
>> I think there is value in running a bot on a stock (albeit currently
>> beta)
Philip Martin writes:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> I've spent the evening digging into what it would take to support Ruby
>> 1.9, but my Ruby-fu is so weak that it'll be more than an evening for
>> me to actually make progress on the issue. I invite more capable
>> hands to join in the effort.
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> I've spent the evening digging into what it would take to support Ruby
> 1.9, but my Ruby-fu is so weak that it'll be more than an evening for
> me to actually make progress on the issue. I invite more capable
> hands to join in the effort.
There were patches submitted
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> For the time being, the Ruby build step and tests have been commented
> out of the relevant scripts.
>
> I think there is value in running a bot on a stock (albeit currently
> beta) install of a popular Linux distribution. We don't control
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> The svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc bot currently lives in my basement, and was
>> recently upgraded to the latest Ubuntu beta release, which bumped a
>> number of dependency versions. The biggest i
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> The svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc bot currently lives in my basement, and was
> recently upgraded to the latest Ubuntu beta release, which bumped a
> number of dependency versions. The biggest issue with the bindings is
> the bump to Ruby 1.9 which we
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> In build/ac-macros/swig.m4 the -ansi flag is explicltly removed for the
>> Ruby bindings so that gcc accepts things like that.
>
> Thanks, that worked. I've committed something to that
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> In build/ac-macros/swig.m4 the -ansi flag is explicltly removed for the
> Ruby bindings so that gcc accepts things like that.
Thanks, that worked. I've committed something to that effect in r1389658.
I also tracked down the root cause in S
Ben Reser writes:
> The line it's erring out on is a C++ style comment:
>// Casts only needed for Perl < 5.10.
>
> which is inside an extern "C". So it's a SWIG bug. I've verified that
> it's still present in 2.0.8.
In build/ac-macros/swig.m4 the -ansi flag is explicltly removed for the
Ru
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> What's happening here is the Perl bindings are failing.
> core.c: In function ‘boot_SVN___Core’:
> core.c:42819:5: error: expected expression before ‘/’ token
> core.c:42819:37: error: too many decimal points in number
> core.c:42812:3: warni
>
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc
> while building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/6128
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
> Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-ubuntu
> Build Reason:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> I spoke in haste. It turns out my ruby-fu is so weak (and the code is
> question is convoluted by the plethora of yield statements) that I
> feel uncomfortable digging into this in any reasonable timeframe. I
> *think* Daniel's
*sigh*
I spoke in haste. It turns out my ruby-fu is so weak (and the code is
question is convoluted by the plethora of yield statements) that I
feel uncomfortable digging into this in any reasonable timeframe. I
*think* Daniel's patch would be useful, but I'm really in no position
to say.
http:
I could have a shot at this but it's not at the top of my list.
(and I don't know Ruby either)
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 21:10:06 +0100:
> We discussed it last month:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-03/0669.shtml
>
> Converting the lists to sets in the testsuite seems t
Is that the final plan? If so, I'll *learn* enough Ruby to implement
it, just to get the bots quiet again. :P
-Hyrum
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> We discussed it last month:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-03/0669.shtml
>
> Converting the lists to sets in the
We discussed it last month:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-03/0669.shtml
Converting the lists to sets in the testsuite seems to be the preferred
option, but I don't know enough Ruby to implement it.
Greg Stein writes:
> This is an ordering failure in the Ruby bindings, presumably due to
>
This is an ordering failure in the Ruby bindings, presumably due to
APR hash order.
Is anybody working on fixing the Ruby bindings to be order-independent
for cases like this?
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 15:00, wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gc
Update: now the swig-py build is failing. :(
It looks like the generated code isn't pulling in a required header
file or something, which causes the bindings build to fail with swig
2.0.4. I've temporarily disabled the python bindings on that bot to
get stuff running again.
-Hyrum
On Mon, Feb 2
Yep. The script should now point to the correct JDK location.
-Hyrum
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Looks like some Java change on the build save?
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 18:03, wrote:
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while
>
Looks like some Java change on the build save?
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 18:03, wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4452
>
> Buildb
25 matches
Mail list logo
