Re: backport.pl now running on svn-qavm3

2016-10-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 16:59:50 +0200: >> > Just a quick heads-up that our backport script (performing our >> > automatic backport merges based on STATUS) is

Re: backport.pl now running on svn-qavm3

2016-10-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 16:59:50 +0200: > > Just a quick heads-up that our backport script (performing our > > automatic backport merges based on STATUS) is now running (nightly > > cron job) on the new machine svn-qavm

Re: backport.pl now running on svn-qavm3

2016-10-07 Thread Stefan
On 10/7/2016 16:59, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a quick heads-up that our backport script (performing our > automatic backport merges based on STATUS) is now running (nightly > cron job) on the new machine svn-qavm3. > > If you see anything out of the ordinary with backports, give a s

Re: backport.pl now running on svn-qavm3

2016-10-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 16:59:50 +0200: > Just a quick heads-up that our backport script (performing our > automatic backport merges based on STATUS) is now running (nightly > cron job) on the new machine svn-qavm3. Thanks Johan!

Re: backport.pl - two features for committers' use

2015-03-05 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Two features of backport.pl that people may not be aware of: > > 1) backport.pl can automate most of the process of entering a new > nomination. [...] > 2) backport.pl can be used interactively (on a committers' workstation) > to review nominations. [...] Thanks for demonst

Re: backport.pl - two features for committers' use

2015-03-04 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 22:51:14 +: > The script can also show the log (by pressing 'l'), open just that entry > in $EDITOR to allow editing the Notes field or the parentheticals (by > pressing 'e'), and add entries to an ignore list so you are never > prompted for them agai

Re: backport.pl still misbehaving

2014-04-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:29:34 +0100: > svn-r...@apache.org writes: > > > Author: svn-role > > Date: Thu Apr 24 04:01:09 2014 > > New Revision: 1589570 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1589570 > > Log: > > Merge r1587968 from trunk: > > > > * r1587968 > >Maintain data

Re: backport.pl feature requests

2013-07-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 17:32:46 +0300: > Are there features others would like to see in backport.pl that would > make it useful for their workflows? For example, if I added a 'show log > messages of these revisions' feature, or a 'Add my +1 to this > nomination' feature, I we

Re: backport.pl

2012-01-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 18:19:08 +0100: > On 26.01.2012 15:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:55:29 +0100: > >> On 25.01.2012 22:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >>> Using tools/dist/backport.pl, I can fully process 3-4 approved > >> - Rewriting

Re: backport.pl

2012-01-26 Thread Branko Čibej
On 26.01.2012 15:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:55:29 +0100: >> On 25.01.2012 22:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> Using tools/dist/backport.pl, I can fully process 3-4 approved >> - Rewriting it in a programming language that's not write-only? :-P > Fair point

Re: backport.pl

2012-01-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:55:29 +0100: > On 25.01.2012 22:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Using tools/dist/backport.pl, I can fully process 3-4 approved > > - Rewriting it in a programming language that's not write-only? :-P Fair point --- I'm the first to admit the choice of lan

Re: backport.pl

2012-01-25 Thread Branko Čibej
On 25.01.2012 22:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Using tools/dist/backport.pl, I can fully process 3-4 approved > STATUS entries in 15 seconds by pressing 'y' three times. > (Reference: r1235925:r1235929 and r1213744:r1213747.) > > At this point I wonder how this could be made more efficient. Options >