RE: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

Bert, thanks for the further explanation. It's making a bit more sense. I'm going to trace the changes through the code and examine the DB before I try to comment any further. I certainly don't want to depend on a new editor - I just want to understand exactly how it works with the present editor

RE: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: woensdag 24 februari 2010 15:24 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: WC-NG presence 'incomplete' > > On Mon, 2010-02-22, I (Julian Foad) wrote: > > Docum

Re: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:24 +, Julian Foad wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-22, I (Julian Foad) wrote: > > Documenting WORKING.presence = 'incomplete'... > > [...] > > My take on this is that we should keep the meanings of the columns > > orthogonal as much as possible. At the DB schema level, there's

Re: WC-NG presence 'incomplete'

On Mon, 2010-02-22, I (Julian Foad) wrote: > Documenting WORKING.presence = 'incomplete'... [...] > My take on this is that we should keep the meanings of the columns > orthogonal as much as possible. At the DB schema level, there's no > reason why files, dirs and sym-links should not all have pro