On 07/03/2010 03:28 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Go and grab your share at
https://tortoiseanalyze.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/tortoiseanalyze/OptimizedSVN/branches/prototype
It is SVN 1.7 + APR 1.3 + ZLIB 1.2.5 tuned for svnadmin and
threaded svnserve performance with FSFS. All tests pass on L
Matt Doran wrote:
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, I started working on SVN's server performance.
Without access to a development repository, I found it hard to
develop a compelling solution to the underlying problems. Thus,
the baby-step patches I sent to this and other lists got
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Stefan Fuhrmann]
* zlib: major deflate() and adler32() speedup, minor inflate() speedup
What is the story with the s->level > 0 thing in deflate.c? I note
that you slide the hash table only if s->level > 0, but the comment
right above this states:
[Stefan Fuhrmann]
> * zlib: major deflate() and adler32() speedup, minor inflate() speedup
What is the story with the s->level > 0 thing in deflate.c? I note
that you slide the hash table only if s->level > 0, but the comment
right above this states:
/* Slide the hash table (could b
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, I started working on SVN's server performance.
Without access to a development repository, I found it hard to
develop a compelling solution to the underlying problems. Thus,
the baby-step patches I sent to this and other lists got often
rejected.
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Mark Mielke wrote:
> On 07/03/2010 06:28 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>
>> What is this all about?
>> ---
>>
>> A couple of weeks ago, I started working on SVN's server performance.
>> Without access to a development repository, I found it hard to
On 07/03/2010 06:28 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
What is this all about?
---
A couple of weeks ago, I started working on SVN's server performance.
Without access to a development repository, I found it hard to
develop a compelling solution to the underlying problems. Thus,
the
7 matches
Mail list logo
