I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> I have only had a chance to skim through your reply so far. I'm glad that
> you find it to be an explicable and harmless difference.
OK, I follow your explanation and agree; thanks. I have closed the isse #4217.
In investigating this, I tried your suggestion of doing
Hi Paul.
I have only had a chance to skim through your reply so far. I'm glad that you
find it to be an explicable and harmless difference.
I have assigned Issue #4217 to track this, as I want to be able to refer to it
before having a chance to study your reply properly.
- Julian
Paul Burb
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> I'm investigating a discrepancy that shows up, when 'symmetric merge' is
> enabled [1], in the notifications printed by some merges. Merge_tests 78
> fails because the expected notification for the last merge is:
>
> --- Merging r6 through r
3 matches
Mail list logo
