Re: Subversion 1.9: svn cp --pin-externals may produce dummy logentries

2015-04-28 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > Bert Huijben wrote: > > I don't think this is really a noop change. Most likely svnadmin dump will > > show that it recorded a change on the fs layer. > > > > The replay API (such as used by svnsync and svnrdump) probably won't show a >

Re: Subversion 1.9: svn cp --pin-externals may produce dummy logentries

2015-04-23 Thread Julian Foad
Bert Huijben wrote: > I don't think this is really a noop change. Most likely svnadmin dump will > show that it recorded a change on the fs layer. > > The replay API (such as used by svnsync and svnrdump) probably won't show a > change. Erm... but that's basically what 'no-op change' means, to me:

RE: Subversion 1.9: svn cp --pin-externals may produce dummy logentries

2015-04-23 Thread Bert Huijben
23-‎4-‎2015 11:27 To: "Marc Strapetz" Cc: "dev@subversion.apache.org" Subject: Re: Subversion 1.9: svn cp --pin-externals may produce dummy logentries On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 07:58:35PM +0200, Marc Strapetz wrote: > After invoking following series of commands: >