On 28.10.2011 18:21, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Johan Corveleyn]
>> Thinking further about it, I think it makes some sense to establish a
>> link between the branch-context, and the place where the branches
>> live. For one thing, it helps to make sure that there are no name
>> collisions between br
[Johan Corveleyn]
> Thinking further about it, I think it makes some sense to establish a
> link between the branch-context, and the place where the branches
> live. For one thing, it helps to make sure that there are no name
> collisions between branches within the same branch-context. And
> peop
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:53:43 +0200:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:38:57 +0200:
> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:38:57 +0200:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 22:24:19 +0200:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:38:57 +0200:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 22:24:19 +0200:
> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad
>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 22:24:19 +0200:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad
>> [...]
>> >> IDENTIFYING BRANCH ROOTS
>> >>
>> >> [[[
>> >> $ svn mer
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 22:24:19 +0200:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad
> [...]
> >> IDENTIFYING BRANCH ROOTS
> >>
> >> [[[
> >> $ svn mergeinfo ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x
> >> Branc
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad
[...]
>> IDENTIFYING BRANCH ROOTS
>>
>> [[[
>> $ svn mergeinfo ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x
>> Branch marker: 'subversion-source-tree' (found on both source and target)
>> [...]
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> You might have posted it already but is there a "big-picture" outline
> > somewhere of where you are going with this?
>
> My goal in one sentence is to stop people accidentally messing up by
> not understanding what they're doing. The closest
Thanks for the comments, Paul. Responses in line...
Paul Burba wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> I want "svn mergeinfo" to show a high-level summary of the situation.
>
> Will we still be able to produce the old-style output via an option?
Yes, certainly; that code is currently absent from the bran
Thanks for the comments, Mark. Responses in line...
Mark Phippard wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>>
>> SHOWING SUMMARIZED MERGEINFO
>>
>> [[[
>> $ svn mergeinfo ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x
>> [...]
>> Revision range(s) recorded as merged:
>> to target path '.':
>> 875965,87596
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> At the moment, on the 'showing-merge-info' branch, I have several
> things going on; here are some of them.
>
> SHOWING SUMMARIZED MERGEINFO
>
> [[[
> $ svn mergeinfo ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x
> [...]
> Revision range(s) re
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> At the moment, on the 'showing-merge-info' branch, I have several
> things going on; here are some of them.
>
>
> SHOWING SUMMARIZED MERGEINFO
>
> [[[
> $ svn mergeinfo ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x
> [...]
> Revision range(s)
13 matches
Mail list logo
