Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-26 Thread Ben Reser
On 2/5/14, 10:36 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > Which leaves the question open as to what version to require. I believe we > should require at least 1.3.x (we know Serf needs it). But would be satisfied > if we can narrow it down to the specific APR versions that cause these > problems. Since there wer

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:43:32PM +, Philip Cornelius wrote: > Thanks for your response.. > > > What do you mean? A revision doesn't exist before it is committed. > > You wrote: > > > Using a binary file that had been committed to a revision that was > > > corrupt > > That sounded like a pr

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-07 Thread Philip Cornelius
Thanks for your response.. > What do you mean? A revision doesn't exist before it is committed. You wrote: > > Using a binary file that had been committed to a revision that was > > corrupt That sounded like a pre-condition for the bug. 'had been' i.e. were you able to reproduce this on a brand

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:18:36AM +, Phil Cornelius wrote: > Stefan Sperling elego.de> writes: > > Using a binary file that had been committed to a revision that was > > > corrupt, we could construct a test case with simply committing this > > > file in a loop and running 'svnadmin verify'

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-07 Thread Phil Cornelius
Stefan Sperling elego.de> writes: > Using a binary file that had been committed to a revision that was > corrupt, we could construct a test case with simply committing this > file in a loop and running 'svnadmin verify' on the HEAD revision > right after. The corruption occurred in about 1

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-06 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 05.02.2014 19:36, Ben Reser wrote: > > It's our burden to set useful dependency requirements. There's plenty of room > for recommendation versus requirements in the 4 places above (build system is > requirement, INSTALL and get-deps.sh ar

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-05 Thread Branko Čibej
On 05.02.2014 19:36, Ben Reser wrote: > It's our burden to set useful dependency requirements. There's plenty of room > for recommendation versus requirements in the 4 places above (build system is > requirement, INSTALL and get-deps.sh are recommendation). Let's update our APR > requirements. Ag

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:28:24PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > On 2/5/14, 10:58 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > APR 1.3.x is used in Red Hat 6. I believe if that version was affected > > we'd have gotten more widespread reports on this issue. Red Hat 5 is old. > > I'm assuming you mean RHEL5 (release

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-05 Thread Ben Reser
On 2/5/14, 10:58 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > APR 1.3.x is used in Red Hat 6. I believe if that version was affected > we'd have gotten more widespread reports on this issue. Red Hat 5 is old. I'm assuming you mean RHEL5 (released in 2007) as opposed to Red Hat 5 (released in 1997).

Re: Required version of APR

2014-02-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:36:57AM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > Stefan Sperling apparently ran into a repository corruption Subversion 1.8.4 > on > RedHat 5 using the system APR (1.2.7). I'm not sure of the details but I'm > sure he can fill them in. This was at a client who asked for an on-site vi