On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 03:24 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>> I noticed the current minimal required serf version on trunk is 0.3.1.
>>> I've only been paying tangential attention, but I seem to r
On 02/08/2011 03:24 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> I noticed the current minimal required serf version on trunk is 0.3.1.
>> I've only been paying tangential attention, but I seem to recall that
>> there have a been a number of improvements in rec
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> I noticed the current minimal required serf version on trunk is 0.3.1.
> I've only been paying tangential attention, but I seem to recall that
> there have a been a number of improvements in recent versions of Serf
> which affect memory and
3 matches
Mail list logo