Re: Minimal Serf version in 1.7.0

2011-02-08 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 02/08/2011 03:24 PM, Paul Burba wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >>> I noticed the current minimal required serf version on trunk is 0.3.1. >>>  I've only been paying tangential attention, but I seem to r

Re: Minimal Serf version in 1.7.0

2011-02-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 02/08/2011 03:24 PM, Paul Burba wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> I noticed the current minimal required serf version on trunk is 0.3.1. >> I've only been paying tangential attention, but I seem to recall that >> there have a been a number of improvements in rec

Re: Minimal Serf version in 1.7.0

2011-02-08 Thread Paul Burba
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > I noticed the current minimal required serf version on trunk is 0.3.1. >  I've only been paying tangential attention, but I seem to recall that > there have a been a number of improvements in recent versions of Serf > which affect memory and