Ben Reser wrote:
> On 5/19/14, 3:11 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> ... Do you know why that "if" condition exists at
>> all? Why do we set the library path only if the library path variable is
>> named
>> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH -- are there some names for which we
>> should
>> not do
On 5/19/14, 3:11 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> There was extra cruft in that patch from a previous discussion. Only
>> the Makefile.in bit is relevant. Trimmed patch attached.
>
> Talking of cruft... Do you know why that "if" condition exists at all? Why do
> we set the library path only if the lib
James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 07:26:20AM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:35:50AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > James McCoy wrote on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 22:00:55 -0400:
>> > > I had tried the below patch but ran into some other issues that I didn't
>>
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 07:26:20AM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:35:50AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > James McCoy wrote on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 22:00:55 -0400:
> > > I had tried the below patch but ran into some other issues that I didn't
> > > have the time/experience t
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:35:50AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> James McCoy wrote on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 22:00:55 -0400:
> > I had tried the below patch but ran into some other issues that I didn't
> > have the time/experience to properly diagnose.
>
> There was no attachment.
Attached.
Thanks
Julian Foad wrote on Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:45:37 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > James McCoy wrote on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 22:00:55 -0400:
> >> I had tried the below patch but ran into some other issues that I didn't
> >> have the time/experience to properly diagnose.
> >
> > There was no
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> James McCoy wrote on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 22:00:55 -0400:
>> I had tried the below patch but ran into some other issues that I didn't
>> have the time/experience to properly diagnose.
>
> There was no attachment.
Last time I checked, a couple of years ago, the mailing li
James McCoy wrote on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 22:00:55 -0400:
> I had tried the below patch but ran into some other issues that I didn't
> have the time/experience to properly diagnose.
There was no attachment.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:11:13AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> More details. The bug shows up when all of these conditions are met:
>
> * there is a development package of Subversion libraries, that we don't
> want to use, installed somewhere (such as /usr);
>
> * the 'serf' package that
Julian Foad wrote:
> I ran into the following issues, testing the 1.7 and 1.8 releases recently.
> Some
> but not necessarily all of these are still a problem on trunk.
>
> 1. JavaHL bindings tests tried to load the libs from /usr, if I had a
> Subversion dev package installed there.
> 1. s
10 matches
Mail list logo
