Re: Issue with Revision 955787

2012-10-29 Thread Philip Martin
Sean Farrell writes: > Will this fix go out in a 1.7.8 and/or 1.8? I've committed it to trunk (1.8) and proposed it for 1.7. > Also, I'm trying to track down what releases have this bug. It looks > like starting with 1.6.12 on up, which includes all of 1.7.x > (i.e. 1.7.0 - 1.7.7). Is that corr

Re: Issue with Revision 955787

2012-10-26 Thread Sean Farrell
I've verified the fix. The "text_status" for the "svn_wc_status2_t" object now has the value of "svn_wc_status_normal". Will this fix go out in a 1.7.8 and/or 1.8? Also, I'm trying to track down what releases have this bug. It looks like starting with 1.6.12 on up, which includes all of 1.7.x

Re: Issue with Revision 955787

2012-10-26 Thread Philip Martin
Sean Farrell writes: > (*status)->text_status = old_status->node_status; > (*status)->prop_status = old_status->prop_status; > > (*status)->repos_text_status = old_status->repos_node_status; > (*status)->repos_prop_status = old_status->repos_prop_status; > > /* Some values might be inherited