Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.12.2014 17:13, Julian Foad wrote:
>> * 'svnadmin load' always rewrites mergeinfo, which can change its form
>> even if it doesn't need to change it semantically. (Except, since
>> r1643074, if it's unparsable, it loads it unchanged instead of bombing
>> out.)
>>
>>
On 17.12.2014 17:13, Julian Foad wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 17.12.2014 15:52, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> In http://svn.apache.org/r1646250 I committed a version that also works by
>>> textual substitution, but (hopefully) without the above-mentioned issues.
>>> This
>>> makes svnsync remove
Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.12.2014 15:52, Julian Foad wrote:
>> In http://svn.apache.org/r1646250 I committed a version that also works by
>> textual substitution, but (hopefully) without the above-mentioned issues.
>> This
>> makes svnsync remove r0 references before trying to commit.
>
> Doe
On 17.12.2014 15:52, Julian Foad wrote:
> I (Julian Foad) wrote on 4th December:
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> ... 'svnsync' ... my current thought is it
>>> should 'correct' the mergeinfo by removing the r0 reference.
>> I have written a test for this, and hacked up code to do this by textual
>> s
I (Julian Foad) wrote on 4th December:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> ... 'svnsync' ... my current thought is it
>> should 'correct' the mergeinfo by removing the r0 reference.
>
> I have written a test for this, and hacked up code to do this by textual
> substitution. It isn't quite right -- for exam
[Second attempt to attach the patch.]
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
>> I'll come to 'svnsync' later, but basically my current thought is it
>> should 'correct' the mergeinfo by removing the r0 reference.
>
> I have written a test for this, and hacked up code to do this by textual
> substitution. It is
On 04.12.2014 19:40, Julian Foad wrote:
> I (Julian Foad) wrote:
>
>>> I'll come to 'svnsync' later, but basically my current thought is it
>>> should 'correct' the mergeinfo by removing the r0 reference.
>> I have written a test for this, and hacked up code to do this by textual
>> substitutio
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
>> I'll come to 'svnsync' later, but basically my current thought is it
>> should 'correct' the mergeinfo by removing the r0 reference.
>
> I have written a test for this, and hacked up code to do this by textual
> substitution. It isn't quite right -- for example it wo
Julian Foad wrote:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4476
[...]
> PROPOSAL
>
> In the presence of a mergeinfo property that refers to r0, at the
> libsvn_repos
> API:
>
> 'dump'
> shall dump the property verbatim (with nowarning). (Done.)
>
> 'load', with 'validate proper
9 matches
Mail list logo
