On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:55:32PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> There's a world of difference here. The former is an error that prevents
>> you from using the working copy. The latter case doesn't prevent anything.
>
> This discussion is a
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:55:32PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> There's a world of difference here. The former is an error that prevents
> you from using the working copy. The latter case doesn't prevent anything.
This discussion is about a performance issue, not a behavioural one.
> BTW, don't y
On 23.06.2014 13:34, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Why not? We can give them a hint, right? Exactly like "Working copy
> 'bla' locked. Run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks." we could say
> "Working copy 'bla' has 10% incorrect metadata. Run 'svn cleanup
> --sync-metadata' to optimize your working copy".
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: maandag 23 juni 2014 11:41
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: Julian Foad; Markus Schaber; Subversion Dev
>> Sub
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: maandag 23 juni 2014 11:41
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: Julian Foad; Markus Schaber; Subversion Dev
> Subject: Re: Issue #4162: make svn status fix timestamp mismatches in meta-
> data
>
On 23.06.2014 11:43, Julian Foad wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> Changing the recorded timestamps would require obtaining a write lock while
>>> performing a status walk... which is a breaking change for any client that
>>> wants to do things concurrently. -1 on 'just doing
Branko Čibej wrote:
> Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Changing the recorded timestamps would require obtaining a write lock while
>> performing a status walk... which is a breaking change for any client that
>> wants to do things concurrently. -1 on 'just doing it' There is a good reason
>> the current cod
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com]
>> Sent: maandag 23 juni 2014 10:03
>> To: Markus Schaber
>> Cc: Subversion Dev (dev@subversion.apache.org)
>> Subject: Issue #4162: make svn status fix
On 23.06.2014 11:08, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com]
>> Sent: maandag 23 juni 2014 10:03
>> To: Markus Schaber
>> Cc: Subversion Dev (dev@subversion.apache.org)
>> Subject: Issue #4162: make svn status fix timestamp mismat
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com]
> Sent: maandag 23 juni 2014 10:03
> To: Markus Schaber
> Cc: Subversion Dev (dev@subversion.apache.org)
> Subject: Issue #4162: make svn status fix timestamp mismatches in meta-
> data
>
> Markus Schaber wrote
10 matches
Mail list logo
