Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Julian Foad
Enabled in r991236. We can leave the #defines in for a little while (like a few days, stsp and I suggest) to facilitate review and comparative testing. - Julian

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Julian Foad > wrote: >> Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests.  ctypes-python >> fails to build for me.  Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in >> single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Phippard
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests.  ctypes-python > fails to build for me.  Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in > single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in multi-db." When I ran JavaHL tests a week or so ago in single

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Julian Foad
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 10:41 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 08/31/2010 10:36 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > > Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests. ctypes-python > > fails to build for me. Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in > > single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in multi

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 08/31/2010 10:36 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests. ctypes-python > fails to build for me. Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in > single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in multi-db." > > Upgrading from a dev version: When the switch is made, af

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Julian Foad
Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests. ctypes-python fails to build for me. Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in multi-db." Upgrading from a dev version: When the switch is made, after updating and re-compiling, each dev using a trunk

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Branko Čibej
On 31.08.2010 15:51, Paul Burba wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Julian Foad wrote: >> We want to get to single-DB mode ASAP. Is anything still blocking us >> from enabling it today? >> >> * One or two test failures? >>- I see stat_tests 5 and 6 failing at r991181. >> >> * Upgrade

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 08/31/2010 09:51 AM, Paul Burba wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Julian Foad wrote: >> We want to get to single-DB mode ASAP. Is anything still blocking us >> from enabling it today? >> >> * One or two test failures? >>- I see stat_tests 5 and 6 failing at r991181. >> >> * Upgra

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Philip Martin
"Bert Huijben" writes: > All tests Pass or XPass on Windows with single-db, except for the > upgrade tests. (Philip is working on this one) Should work now. -- Philip

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Paul Burba
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > We want to get to single-DB mode ASAP.  Is anything still blocking us > from enabling it today? > >  * One or two test failures? >    - I see stat_tests 5 and 6 failing at r991181. > >  * Upgrade from 1.6? >    - I don't think this should block

RE: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: dinsdag 31 augustus 2010 15:41 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Enabling Single-DB mode today > > We want to get to single-DB mode ASAP. Is anything still blocking us > from enabling it today? >