Philip Martin writes:
> The intention is that renaming the wc.db file makes the working copy a
> 1.7 working copy. At that stage running 'svn cleanup' will finish the
> upgrade.
There is a window between renaming the wc.db file and removing the 1.6
metadata by running the workqueue to completio
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 13:55, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>>
>>> It seems that if user cancel svn upgrade operation in post upgrade
>>> step (removing old .svn directories) working will stay in unusable
>>> state. Is it makes sense to make svn_wc__wipe_
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 13:55, Philip Martin wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
>> It seems that if user cancel svn upgrade operation in post upgrade
>> step (removing old .svn directories) working will stay in unusable
>> state. Is it makes sense to make svn_wc__wipe_postupgrade() since it
>> just r
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> It seems that if user cancel svn upgrade operation in post upgrade
> step (removing old .svn directories) working will stay in unusable
> state. Is it makes sense to make svn_wc__wipe_postupgrade() since it
> just removes .svn for subdirectories inside wcroot?
When we renam
4 matches
Mail list logo
