On 09/28/2012 10:52 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Apparently, this has been fixed for 1.7. The reporter doesn't say which
> version they're using.
Xlnt.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Apparently, this has been fixed for 1.7. The reporter doesn't say which
version they're using.
~/w$ ll
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 brane staff 86 Sep 28 16:47 foo
~/w$ cat foo
$Revision: 3 $
$Author: brane $
$Date: 2012-09-28 16:47:15 +0200 (Fri, 28 Sep 2012) $
~/w$ svn cp foo bar
A bar
~/w$
Despite the protocol failure by the reporter, I do think there's a bit of UI
#fail here. Subversion users shouldn't be expected to know that "-1" is
secret code for "invalid revision". Our keyword expansion code should just
show a empty revision there instead. I'm guessing we show -1 in 'svn
sta
Actually, I think there's a bit of UI #fail here. Subversion users
shouldn't be expected to know that "-1" is secret code for "invalid
revision". Our keyword expansion code should just show a empty revision
there instead. I'm guessing we show -1 in 'svn status' and 'svn info'
output too. Let's
On 28.09.2012 12:27, SENTHIL C wrote:
> Hi Support,
This is not a Subversion support mailing list. Your question more
properly belongs on us...@subversion.apache.org.
-- Brane
P.S.: Revision, Author and Date are not defined until you commit a file
to the repository.
> I can see that Revision s
5 matches
Mail list logo
