Re: Authz suggestion

2017-12-13 Thread Paul Hammant
Filed - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4710

Re: Authz suggestion

2017-12-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Paul Hammant wrote: > Jira feature request needed to capture anything from this thread? Maybe > not, if plans were already in action anyway... I'd say yes, please put something in JIRA, because (it seems to me) those plans are quite "soft" at the moment. It migh

Re: Authz suggestion

2017-12-11 Thread Paul Hammant
Jira feature request needed to capture anything from this thread? Maybe not, if plans were already in action anyway...

Re: Authz suggestion

2017-12-10 Thread Paul Hammant
> > > Specifically, by "currently" I mean that this is the state on trunk. :) > I don't believe anyone is working on adding explicit traversal > permission on trunk in time for 1.10. It would require some rework of > the way the authz info is used within the core libraries, it's not just > a questi

Re: Authz suggestion

2017-12-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.12.2017 14:46, Paul Hammant wrote: > > Currently it's implied in 'r' and 'rw' modes.  > > Great news. Specifically by currently you mean in 1.9.7 right?  And > that further enhancements are Coming in 1.10. > > You also said you’ve a plan for further enhancements :) Specifically, by "currentl

Re: Authz suggestion

2017-12-10 Thread Paul Hammant
> Currently it's implied in 'r' and 'rw' modes. Great news. Specifically by currently you mean in 1.9.7 right? And that further enhancements are Coming in 1.10. You also said you’ve a plan for further enhancements :)

Re: Authz suggestion

2017-12-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.12.2017 10:28, Paul Hammant wrote: > Consider: > > [/] > harry=rw > > [dataset:/A] > sally=rw > > [dataset:/Z] > sally=rw > > > If I had directories B through Y, I am pretty sure Sally cannot see > them let along change anything in them. Cool that's what I want. > > Wh