Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 14:13:04 +0100: > Philip Martin writes: > > > Philip Martin writes: > > > >> RHEL 6 is on Python 2.6 and is unlikely to change. Python 2.7 is > >> available as a Red Hat Software Collection component. > > > > The Software Collection python27 is suffic

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-24 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > Philip Martin writes: > >> RHEL 6 is on Python 2.6 and is unlikely to change. Python 2.7 is >> available as a Red Hat Software Collection component. > > The Software Collection python27 is sufficient to build Subversion and > run the regression tests but some of the test

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-24 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > RHEL 6 is on Python 2.6 and is unlikely to change. Python 2.7 is > available as a Red Hat Software Collection component. The Software Collection python27 is sufficient to build Subversion and run the regression tests but some of the tests FAIL. The tests that fail all i

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-24 Thread Philip Martin
Branko Čibej writes: > [please do not top-post] > > On 24.07.2015 11:00, Stefan Hett wrote: >> In case that helps with the decision making process: >> Debian 5.0 (lenny - no longer supported): py 2.5 >> Debian 6.0 (squeeze - current oldoldstable): py2.6 >> Debian 7.0/8.0/9.0 (wheezy/jessie/stretc

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-24 Thread Branko Čibej
gt; makes sense to stop supporting those versions in 1.9/trunk. >> >> Those very old enterprise versions will just have to be upgraded, IMO. >> >> >>> ---------------- >>> From: Branko Čibej <mailto:br...@wandisco.com> >>> Sent: ‎23-‎7-‎2015 11:02 >>>

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-24 Thread Stefan Hett
will just have to be upgraded, IMO. From: Branko Čibej <mailto:br...@wandisco.com> Sent: ‎23-‎7-‎2015 11:02 To: dev@subversion.apache.org <mailto:dev@subversion.apache.org> Subject: Re: 1.9.0 minimal Pytho

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-23 Thread Branko Čibej
prise versions will just have to be upgraded, IMO. > > From: Branko Čibej <mailto:br...@wandisco.com> > Sent: ‎23-‎7-‎2015 11:02 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org <mailto:dev@subversion.apache.org> > Su

RE: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-23 Thread Bert Huijben
he.org" Subject: Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version On 23.07.2015 10:30, Stefan Hett wrote: > Hi, > >>>> - For 1.9, it's a little late to make any changes, but I would >>>> consider >>>>dropping py2.5 support (and converting to the 'except

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-23 Thread Branko Čibej
On 23.07.2015 10:30, Stefan Hett wrote: > Hi, > - For 1.9, it's a little late to make any changes, but I would consider dropping py2.5 support (and converting to the 'except' 'as' syntax), since for 1.9 py3 support is more important than py2.5 support. Thoug

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

2015-07-23 Thread Stefan Hett
Hi, - For 1.9, it's a little late to make any changes, but I would consider dropping py2.5 support (and converting to the 'except' 'as' syntax), since for 1.9 py3 support is more important than py2.5 support. Thoughts? I'd rather not mess with the 1.9 branch at this point ... we're so cl

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version (was: Re: [PATCH] Error out with proper error message when using Python >= 3.0

2015-07-22 Thread Branko Čibej
On 22.07.2015 13:46, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > [Re-sending with a new subject to draw attention to the 1.9 question.] > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31:31 +: >> Stefan Hett wrote on Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 16:59:08 +0200: >>> Please note that while testing I also found 1.7/1.8 not