On Thursday 20 June 2013 09:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> 1.8.0 calls gcc with -std=c90. For my Solaris 10 Sparc using gcc 4.7.2
> this leads to "_STRICT_STDC" getting defined and then limits.h no longer
> defines PATH_MAX. So apr.h bombs out during compile with:
>
> #error no decision has been made
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:38:11PM -0700, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 22:30, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 20.06.2013 17:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
> >> 1.8.0 calls gcc with -std=c90. For my Solaris 10 Sparc using gcc 4.7.2
> >> this leads to "_STRICT_STDC" getting defined and then limits.h no lon
On 20.06.2013 23:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 22:38, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.06.2013 22:30, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 20.06.2013 17:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
1.8.0 calls gcc with -std=c90. For my Solaris 10 Sparc using gcc 4.7.2
this leads to "_STRICT_STDC" getting defined an
On 20.06.2013 22:38, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 22:30, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.06.2013 17:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> 1.8.0 calls gcc with -std=c90. For my Solaris 10 Sparc using gcc 4.7.2
>>> this leads to "_STRICT_STDC" getting defined and then limits.h no longer
>>> defines PATH_MAX
On 20.06.2013 22:30, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 17:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> 1.8.0 calls gcc with -std=c90. For my Solaris 10 Sparc using gcc 4.7.2
>> this leads to "_STRICT_STDC" getting defined and then limits.h no longer
>> defines PATH_MAX. So apr.h bombs out during compile with:
>>
>>
On 20.06.2013 17:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
> 1.8.0 calls gcc with -std=c90. For my Solaris 10 Sparc using gcc 4.7.2
> this leads to "_STRICT_STDC" getting defined and then limits.h no longer
> defines PATH_MAX. So apr.h bombs out during compile with:
>
> #error no decision has been made on APR_PATH_MA
6 matches
Mail list logo