Re: 1.8 release notes - Working copy records moves as first-class operation

2013-06-20 Thread Julian Foad
Ben Reser wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: >+What this does not mean: >>+ >>+  Moves are recorded as such only within the working copy. The link >>+    between the copy and the delete is established only when a local move >>+    operation is performed, and is lost upon commit. >>+ > > This reads weird,

Re: 1.8 release notes - Working copy records moves as first-class operation

2013-06-20 Thread Ben Reser
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > +What this does not mean: > + > + Moves are recorded as such only within the working copy. The link > +between the copy and the delete is established only when a local move > +operation is performed, and is lost upon commit. > + > Thi

Re: 1.8 release notes - Working copy records moves as first-class operation

2013-06-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > I just noticed the "Working copy records moves as first-class operation" > section in the release notes may not be clear enough, as it doesn't > explicitly point out that the local move is NOT preserved as a move when > committed.  I