Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Scott Palmer
On 2011-09-09, at 11:59 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > On 09/09/2011 05:25 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: >> Btw, I haven't had a chance to go back to 1.6 to test - is the issue with >> svn:externals referencing a file fixed? It used to add the file as both an >> external and a regular file so it was co

Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
On 09/09/2011 05:59 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > On 09/09/2011 05:25 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: >> Btw, I haven't had a chance to go back to 1.6 to test - is the issue with >> svn:externals referencing a file fixed? It used to add the file as both an >> external and a regular file so it was confl

Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
On 09/09/2011 05:25 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: > Btw, I haven't had a chance to go back to 1.6 to test - is the issue with > svn:externals referencing a file fixed? It used to add the file as both an > external and a regular file so it was conflicting with itself. > > Scott Are you referring to i

Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Scott Palmer
On 2011-09-09, at 11:14 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > On 09/09/2011 04:41 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >> And note that a .svn dir remains in XB/XC (seen in the final 'ls') > > I would like to add that 'upgrade' does leave the .svn folders behind > everywhere, but running 'svn info' in the separate

Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
To end the confusion: .svn folders are left behind only in working copy roots. Dir externals are working copy roots and should therefore have a .svn folder after 'svn upgrade', but it should be a 1.7-.svn. (thx Bert) ~Neels On 09/09/2011 05:14 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > On 09/09/2011 04:41 PM,

Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
On 09/09/2011 04:41 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > And note that a .svn dir remains in XB/XC (seen in the final 'ls') I would like to add that 'upgrade' does leave the .svn folders behind everywhere, but running 'svn info' in the separate folders confirms that BX/ is a 1.7 WC and BX/CX is not. ~Nee

Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
On 09/08/2011 06:21 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: > Just tried 1.7.0RC2 and noticed that bugs with svn upgrade are still present. > > If you have svn:externals in the top level of your working copy they seem to > be converted, but if those external references also use svn:externals then > those nested w